Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Romance -> take off my aviation age

Chapter 1063 Global Satellite Navigation System

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    No wonder the leaders behaved like this.

    The Joint Standoff Strike Weapon is a low-cost, high-efficiency precision-guided weapon proposed by the United States in 1994 after summarizing its experience in the Gulf War.

    It is based on conventional aerial bombs, equipped with a control surface equipped with inertial guidance and GPS global satellite positioning system components, combined with folded wide aspect ratio wings to create a high-precision long-range dropped ammunition.

    Its basic range is 63 kilometers; the range of the improved version equipped with a rocket-assisted system is increased to 200 kilometers.

    As for the principle of application of this type of ammunition, it is not complicated. It is nothing more than applying the mechanism of a high-altitude unpowered glider to make the heavy bomb with folding wings float towards the target.

    It¡¯s just that it is not used for unpowered gliders, which use human power to control the rudder surface and wing steering. The joint standoff strike weapon controls the rudder surface in real time to revise the course based on the established parameters of inertial navigation and the coordinate position of the global satellite positioning system.

    Because of this, the most valuable part of the entire set of joint standoff strike weapons is the inertial satellite guidance system integrated in the tail.

    As for the bomb itself, even the rocket booster is not worth much money, especially the rocket booster device, which looks high-end, but is actually just a few pillars of powder similar to fireworks installed on the missile body.

    Those who are more particular will control the activation time as needed. For example, if the flying height of the bomb is low, click and climb to glide further, but it is not permanently effective and can only be activated three times at best.

    It¡¯s simple and crude. After throwing it, turn on the boost, release it in one breath, then spread your wings and glide farther with the help of strong inertia.

    However, whether it is all-in-one stud or staged release, this type of technology can be said to be very mature, it is just a little more advanced than the two-kick kick.

    Even the inertial satellite guidance components, which account for 60% of the cost, are actually not that expensive as expected. Not to mention that inertial guidance is also a very mature product and has been equipped in large quantities in equipment for a long time. Even the global satellite positioning system, for Americans,  It is said that it is also a cheap product. After all, other people's GPS has already recovered the cost in the civilian field.

    A large number of software, positioning devices, and transceiver components developed based on GPS have already formed a complete and mature industrial chain. With a little integration, the US military can form a very effective guidance and positioning architecture.

    Because of this, the joint standoff weapon is not too cheap for the US military. The comprehensive procurement cost of an ordinary 500 kilogram joint standoff weapon is only US$15,000.

    ¡°Compared to cruise missiles that easily cost 1 million US dollars each and tactical ballistic missiles that cost 3 million US dollars each, joint standoff strike weapons are so cheap that they can explode.

    The problem is that this type of weapon cannot help but be cheap, and its accuracy is equally good. Taking the 500-kilogram joint standoff strike weapon as an example, the comprehensive circular probability accuracy does not exceed 12 meters.

    You must know that the explosion radiation radius of a 500-kilogram aerial bomb must be at least 20 meters. The accuracy of 12 meters means that as long as a 500-kilogram joint standoff strike weapon hits, the target's chance of survival is zero.

    Because of this, the US military has a soft spot for joint standoff strike weapons. It not only makes great efforts to develop such conventional weapons, but also actively develops special equipment.

    For example, ground-penetrating bombs designed to attack strong hangars, bunkers, and underground command bunkers.

    In addition, the US military has spared no effort to transfer this type of technology to its own nuclear arsenal, using the mature technology and accumulated experience of joint standoff weapons to upgrade the US military's large number of airborne B61 tactical nuclear weapons.  The hit accuracy of nuclear weapons increased from 300 meters to an astonishing 10 meters.

    This is why the Americans continue to put pressure on Russia and other other permanent members in the new round of nuclear disarmament negotiations, demanding that they jointly reduce the charge yield of tactical nuclear weapons.

    The hit accuracy of American tactical nuclear weapons has improved. Even if the charge yield is reduced by 50%, it will not affect the combat effectiveness, but will make it more flexible.

    ¡°Russia and other countries don¡¯t have the perverted level of hit accuracy that Americans have. They can only maintain the charge equivalent and use power to make up for the lack of accuracy.

    The result is that the United States easily takes the moral high ground, accusing Russia and other countries of disregarding world peace, being selfish, following the old path of the Soviet Union's demise, and secluded themselves from the people of the world.

    No way, this is the manifestation of technological hegemony in military, political and even diplomatic terms.

    ????????????????????????????????????????????????? I really want to say something full-screen and open my mouth, and other people want to refute, I¡¯m sorry, do you have the technology for joint stand-off strike weapons?

    Yes, no, not a single country.

    Although the cost of joint off-zone strike weapons is not high and all technologies are mature, there is aThe first premise is that there must be an independent global satellite navigation system.

    Based on this, we can arrogantly announce that we will cut the yield of our tactical nuclear weapons by half, and then brazenly point to others to engage in military warfare, regardless of world peace.

    However, except for the United States, which has achieved complete practicality in GPS, other countries are blank in this regard.

    Of course, Russia has its own satellite navigation system. The problem is that Russia's economic situation is really bad. Just barely maintaining the navigation system left over from the Soviet era has forced Russia to use all its strength to make its own strategic rockets.  It is already a miracle that the army maintains basic accuracy. How can we have the energy to consider other things?

    Because of this, all countries in the world know that joint standoff strike weapons are a good thing, but only the United States can really use them.

    Since it is a sole business, it is a de facto monopoly. Since it is a monopoly, the selling price is immeasurable.

    The U.S. military uses one for its own use at US$15,000, but the price for sales abroad is at least 10 times higher. Not long ago, the French Air Force ordered a batch of 500-kilogram joint standoff strike weapons, with a unit price of US$200,000.

    There was indeed a discount for this biological son of Israel, but it was also sold for US$140,000.

    ¡°But even so, there are still many countries that are eager for this kind of weapons, including China. The problem is how much money is spent domestically. Americans will not sell you, so it is useless to rush for them.

    I thought that this thing would not be seen in China within ten years, but I didn¡¯t expect to see a domestically produced 500-kg joint aircraft on the pylon of the improved FBC-1A fighter-bomber in the hangar of Ascendas Group¡¯s new second branch factory.  Standoff strike weapons.

    How could the leaders who have been coveting similar weapons from the United States not be excited like this?

    But precisely because of this, the doubts in their hearts have become more intense, because the core of this type of weapon is a satellite positioning system, which is still blank in China. How did Ascendas Group solve it?

    "We use the Russian GLONASS satellite positioning system. The theoretical accuracy can reach 3 meters. However, after our actual testing, it can only be maintained at about 15 meters and is unstable. Fortunately, our inertial navigation system is excellent enough.  , in order to control the accuracy of the gsn-500max precision guided bomb to 22 meters."

    Before the chiefs could ask questions, Zhuang Jianye had already told the whole story about satellite positioning. Then he looked at the head of the headquarters and made a request that shocked everyone present: "Chief, I personally think we should develop our own global satellite."  Regarding navigation systems, ordinary people know that if you want to get rich, you must first build roads. Roads are infrastructure. Global satellite navigation systems are also infrastructure in outer space. Roads can make people rich, and global satellite navigation systems can also make our country rich and strong.  , Chief~~~~"

    If you like Soar My Aviation Age, please collect it: Soar My Aviation Age is updated the fastest.  (Remember the website address: www.hlnovel.com
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report