Jiang Mingzhu and Yu Xuexian who left were discussing this matter. Jiang Mingzhu had the same idea as Teacher Lu, thinking that the junior sister might be discriminated against by a foreign reviewer.
The reason why she asked immediately when they met was because He Xiangyu had said that he would pass quickly, but the result had not come out yet, which made people wonder.
Jiang Mingzhu advocated: "She should have made comments to the editor-in-chief and complained that the reviewer had a problem."
Internationally renowned journals carry a reputation, and the editor-in-chief is a relatively fair academic person.
Yu Xuexian lifted his glasses with his fingers, looking much calmer than his younger wife.
Things are not that simple. If a complaint can solve the problem, why should Director Fang emphasize the need to build a good domestic platform?
What is academic publishing called?
Seizing intellectual patent rights. Think about it, if the research topic of the article you publish happens to be similar or similar to someone else, that person happens to be the reviewer. You said that the reviewer saw something that his research results had not yet released and was first reviewed by you.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Student Xie¡¯s thesis questions mainly focused on domestic questions and he passed the test smoothly without any questions from the big guys in China. Don't say here that everyone in the country has to look at the face of big boss Cao Yudong. This is impossible. Cao Yudong has his own competitors
of. Don¡¯t blame Teacher Lu for suspecting that there are people abroad who are wearing colored glasses and have ulterior motives.
There are more talents in international academic competition, and it is undoubtedly far more complicated and cruel than within a single country. Don¡¯t say stupid things about scholars having no national boundaries. That¡¯s just to fool young people who don¡¯t understand society. There are many scheming people in the world who are eager to use such honest words to let some foolish scholars who dream of academic purity share the results.
come out.
If you can¡¯t study it yourself, you can learn from other people¡¯s shared results. It can be said that the world of highly intelligent scholars is never pure. On the contrary, the mystery of "killing" is hidden in it. Academia requires money, and it cannot develop without money, so it must be linked to commercial interests. Business war is like a battlefield, learn
How could the academic world not be a battlefield?
It can be seen that once you are unlucky enough to encounter this kind of problem during the submission process, the situation will be far more complicated than you think.
As long as there is a conflict of interests, it is impossible for peer reviewers not to secretly get you. How to mess with you? People with high IQs have much more insidious methods. Referring to Zhou Ruomei's insidious behavior towards her own relatives, she is just a little shrimp with low IQ.
The most common way is: drag you to death.
I won¡¯t reject you directly. Rejecting you directly may cause you to choose another place. It is best to revise the manuscript frequently once, twice or three times. This is why the review time for some manuscripts is incredibly long.
Of course, you can never say that all the reviewers who ask you to revise your manuscript are bad reviewers. How can you tell whether the reviewer has good intentions or evil intentions?
This is what happened to classmate Xie.
The good news leaked by Dr. Li Xiaoshen is correct. She passed the first three reviews of the international platform as quickly as domestic ones, which makes people speculate that her manuscripts will be published soon. Eventually she got stuck with the fourth reviewer.
This fourth reviewer has been catching grammatical errors in her paper.
Once again, Director Fang¡¯s words are justified. When the domestic platform becomes stronger, it can take another needed advantage: the language system.
The academic barriers and academic traps of different language systems are also difficult for laymen to imagine. If the reviewer really catches her for grammatical errors, forget it. No, they are trying to make her change the key academic information of the paper and the logical structure of her own paper by picking on the grammatical errors. (Remember the website address: www.hlnovel.com