Not to mention asking a healthy person to donate part of his body to others.
Medicine cannot provide 100% guarantee, which is reflected in the fact that many publicity about donations only focuses on moral propaganda, and technical shortcomings are evaded if possible. The problem is that ordinary people cannot be deceived. This is the most ridiculous thing about this propaganda strategy for all medical staff. You lie to the people and say that doing this has no side effects. Once they find out that it is not the case, they will completely question what you said and hate you to death.
Publicity says that bone marrow transplantation is no longer about transplanting bones, but about peripheral hematopoietic stem cells. It is painless and has no risks. In fact, before each donor actually wants to donate, he will receive an informed consent form, which lists various risks for you and requires you to bear the consequences. I got a lot of previously registered volunteers to curse, and I never told them about this during the previous promotion.
Why medical staff have the deepest experience of this kind of thing is because when clinical explanations are not sufficient, they often encounter doctors who are told by ordinary people that they lied to me and then hate you to death.
Human life is of paramount importance, and human life is the first priority among ordinary people. How can you lie to people? You have to know that saying something less is a lie in the eyes of the people.
What is the final result? Not to mention domestic, the bone marrow donation regret rate abroad can reach more than 50%. Does this kind of publicity make you feel like you can deceive everyone? It is simply a strategy to dig holes and smear yourself, and I am ready to go all the way to the bottom. I don¡¯t know whether it is a propaganda to get people to donate or a propaganda to get people not to donate.
Whether donation is encouraged or not is definitely encouraged. Many medical staff are registered volunteers themselves. They know that donation poses very low risks to their own safety, so why not do it if it can save lives. However, an important prerequisite is that the donor must be a healthy person.
Medical research is done by healthy people donating to patients. It's not okay for you to ask unhealthy people to donate. It's also irresponsible to the patients.
If there is an accident that no one wants to see, specific cases must be analyzed scientifically. There is nothing we can do about the unlucky 0.01% chance of a medical accident, so the principle of voluntariness is even more necessary. Another kind of accident is avoidable. It is caused by irregular operation and is more likely to occur. It is the root cause of most accidents.
No matter how understanding she is, for example, when she thanked a classmate for donating blood last time, all the teachers scratched her nose. You can show love if you want. Please take responsibility for yourself first. If something happens to a donor and causes serious consequences, it will affect the entire society's trust and confidence in the donation cause.
Those who don¡¯t understand will scold those who regret donating. Anyone who understands the seriousness of this matter will not scold any medical staff or donation center staff. Forcing people to lay their heads on their heads to donate is like tying people up and using them as livestock. The social consequences of something going wrong after donating are even more devastating. Like Ding Lulu last time, you can induce her to donate, but you can't force her to donate. If she refuses to donate before the battle and regrets donating, she must be respected.
Where do forced donations usually occur? Relatives.
To what extent can relatives be tied up and forced to donate? How many people in the same family force an individual to donate, and if he/she does not donate, he/she will die. Sympathy for the weak must be measured, otherwise it will lead to more terrible oppression of another weak person.