What do you need to know to master the rules of the game in modern art? ¡ª¡ªIncluding nearly a hundred artists and their representative works, it sorts out the origin and evolution of more than 20 modern art schools, and outlines the development process of modern art. What happened to art in the past 150 years? Why is it that today, something that a five-year-old child can tinker with is actually a masterpiece in the history of art?
Is this art? This has to be art! ¡ª¡ªMalevich's black square, Mondrian's colorful grid, Duchamp's urinal Art no longer has to be about beauty, it's more about ideas. After uncovering the mysteries of those grotesque and varied art schools, they are actually surprisingly simple, yet wonderful and even great.
If we can vaguely recognize the "original" appearance of art from Monet's "Sunrise" and Van Gogh's "Starry Night" more than 150 years ago, then Andy Waugh 150 years later Hall's cans of Soup Soup, Damien Hirst's pickled shark, and Tracey Emin's messy bed are enough to show us other possibilities for art. Looking back on the rebellious road of modern art for a century and a half, we have witnessed how generations of people have become more rebellious, bold and chaotic. Behind this is the artist's endless questioning of "what is art", and their response and resistance to the world around them. The story of modern art continues, and may never be finished¡ª¡ª
I don¡¯t know if you know anything about modern art and contemporary art. I don¡¯t know anything about this area, and I have never had any idea about it. After all, many works of contemporary art are really too mysterious, and the only thing I can get is the price. , For a while, because of the need to visit exhibitions frequently due to work, I randomly picked this relatively high-rated art history to make up for my homework, but I bought it for half a year without turning a page.
The opportunity to open it was that gucci held an exhibition of "the artist is present". The poster used was the poster of "the artist is on the scene" made by Marina Abramovich at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, because I had seen her documentary "The Artist" On the Site" (available at Station B, pushed in the old pit), I take it for granted that this is an exhibition about Abramovich, regardless of the introduction information on the exhibition page. Of course, I was cheated. I queued for almost 4 hours, but it turned out that they were all works by other artists. It was a headache to watch contemporary art without doing my homework. There were too many people at the scene. Well, it can be said that we queued for four hours and visited for 40 minutes. Of these forty minutes, at least 10 minutes were waiting in front of the exhibits.
After returning home, I suddenly felt that it was time to open this book. I spent 2 months reading it intermittently, because this book has few pictures, and most of the content revolves around the author¡¯s works. I was confused. Last month When Douban recommended, I suddenly found two posts: one was [Excerpt] 150 Years of Modern Art, and the other was Lillian¡¯s photo album - 150 Years of Modern Art. The former directly made the book into a graphic version, while the latter sorted out the works mentioned in the book in order, read the book again with a photo album, and finally got a little idea of ??modern art. I don't know if jj will swallow the link. If you want to read it, you can just search it. If you read the excerpt, you don't need the book.
The foreshadowing was finally done, and we started talking about books. In fact, when people say "I don't know anything about art", most of them are referring to modern art and classical painting. Ordinary people still have more or less concepts. It¡¯s no problem (here¡¯s a repost of "Talking about Strange Cafes in the Art Museum" is easy to read and easy to understand, with many pictures and paragraphs). But for modern art, if you don¡¯t understand it, you will be blind, and you often wonder whether modern art is a scam?
Although I didn¡¯t think modern art was a hoax before reading this book, I didn¡¯t take them as serious art either. As a result, I learned about each doctrine and found that they are the ones that have a greater and deeper impact on our lives. If you are a master of handwriting, basically all kinds of doctrines in modern art can cover you, whether it is postcards, posters, collages, tapes, ornaments, labelsall deeply influenced Well, many people like to hang paintings by Matisse and Picasso when they decorate their rooms, and they happen to be rivals. Although Matisse is more popular in terms of sales volume, Picasso has a deeper influence on modern people in other ways. For example, a fragment of oilcloth was pasted on a painting by Picasso. He and Braque created collages together, before them, and No one ever thought of cutting something out and pasting it on another thing. From another perspective, the two of them are the fathers of handbooks. They have also extended from two-dimensional collages to three-dimensional collages. Picasso¡¯s "Guitar" is to glue cards, wires, and ropes together to make a guitar. This can be associated with us. Now there are a lot of wire vases and so on.
Picasso is Cubism, Matisse is Fauvism, I don¡¯t remember Braque but it should be Cubism, and after them is Futurism. Futurism and politics are closely linked because¡The founder is not a painter but a novelist. The way he establishes a school is not to come up with his works first and wait for critics to classify them, but to first publish the newspaper and tell the world: I founded futurism, what is futurism and what is the definition of 1234
Followers of this doctrine are recruited by the founder himself. Regardless of whether the other party recognizes it or not, it is enough for the founder to recognize it. If he recognizes it, he will have real followers. The process of making a fortune is like pyramid schemes. Futurism has two influences on later generations: one is that it has greatly affected fascism, and the other is that all kinds of doctrines behind it like to market and hype themselves.
Next is Kandinsky and Orphism. It seems difficult for me to explain it to you. I can only say that the paintings are more abstract. Kandinsky met the musician Schoenberg and was influenced by Wagner. Painting should develop towards music. I created "Painting with Circles" and painted with the heart of drawing music scores. Painting is much like a color spectrum. Orphism is like a fusion of Cubism and Futurism.
After the painting becomes abstract, there are Suprematism and Constructivism, both of which originated in Russia. These two doctrines have a deep influence on handbooks, posters, and decorations. The representative work of Suprematism is "Black Square". As the name suggests, the painting is a standard black square , more abstract than Kandinsky, Kandinsky still has various shapes and colors, here is a single shape and color. Author comment: "Abstract art puts everyone in danger of looking like a fool, believing in something that doesn't exist."
Constructivism removes the base of sculpture for the first time, and sculpture no longer exists to imitate or reproduce real life, but becomes an independent object. Everyone simply understands that a plaster man with a base turns into a simple triangle or other various irregular graphic ornaments.
Next is Neoplasticism. Mondrian, the representative of this school, limited painting colors to three primary colors (red, yellow and blue), only two shapes (square and rectangle), and only black horizontal and vertical lines for connections. If you think of a painting according to these three conditions in your mind, it is a plasticist work. It belongs to further lowering the threshold of art, making art a Lego building block for adults. Everyone uses the same components to create similar works.
Next is Bauhaus, a lot of furniture is influenced by it, and there are many more, I decided not to popularize science, writing science popularization is really tiring, although even Duchamp and 31 women who touched me the most led to this science popularization exhibition I'm sorry for abandoning the pit before talking, but the seedlings are more ready to eat. If you are interested, go and see for yourself. It must be accompanied by pictures! ! Otherwise, looking at it is the same as looking at it for nothing.
¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù¡ù
There must be mistakes in my summary, but because I can't see it, so when you correct the mistakes, you must remember to attach the correct answer (remember the website URL: www.hlnovel.com