Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Prose -> speak alone

The end of a piece of news

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    ?

    I saw a comment on the reference news today. It is about the "Students Research Cancer Award" event that has been relatively popular in the past few days. In order to cultivate the whole story of an event and make some learning and summary habits, click in.  After reading it, I learned how to write comments, and the comments look pretty good.

    Since I consciously read the news for the purpose of learning, there have been many incidents of academic fraud, not only academic fraud, but also many cases of educational incidents rushing to the hot search.  Needless to say, Zhai Tianlin's thesis was falsified. Recently, Tongzhuo's previous students were replaced by new students, and Shandong's college entrance examination was replaced. There are so many disadvantages in the education system.  But I don't know about education, and other places may not be better. It's just because education is too important, so every malpractice revealed affects the hearts of every Chinese.

    When I graduated, I didn¡¯t pay special attention to academic matters. At that time, the graduation thesis was not checked so strictly. At that time, because I thought, I should say goodbye to that field with confidence, instead of fleeing, so I wrote the code very seriously.  I was writing a thesis, and a new mobile phone I took from home was broken by the program.  Thinking about it now, although the thesis was poor and nothing new, it was done seriously by myself, so I didn¡¯t have any worries about the strict investigation of the thesis caused by the Zhai Tianlin incident after graduation.

    This is a long way off topic, just to talk, without any purpose.

    Regarding the comment on the reference news, after reading the content, I went back and re-read what was written in each paragraph, so as to summarize the writing mode of an article.  Recently, I have been cultivating this habit. After reading the article, I go back and read it quickly. The first time I read the content, the second time I read the structure of the article.  In the past, I always thought that articles were natural, as if at a certain moment, the muse came to the divine consciousness, and then wrote a shocking work.  So the idea of ??the article is rather vulgar, which hinders the presentation of the masterpiece, but after reading a lot of news, good and bad, there are quite a lot of articles, good and bad, even watching TV series,  Movies, animation, etc., even a picture that can be called a good one, all illustrate a truth. The presentation of a man-made object that can be called a finished product has structures in it, and it is the support of these structures.  Only then can the object be presented as a finished product.  After discovering this matter, every time you summarize the same summary, certain things will become weaker and weaker in your consciousness, and the consciousness that was once regarded as the supreme will become weaker and weaker, and now it is almost  Forget what it is, just know that some very important things are fading a little bit in reality.  In fact, you are disappointed to find the structure of the article.  You seek the Supreme, only to find its remains along the way.

    I ran away again. I originally wanted to summarize the writing mode of that review and make a record. I couldn't help but drag it to other places while talking.

    From Lu Xun's critical essays, we can see that a critical article always has to trace the source of the object of criticism.  So is this article.  The author talked about the original intention of the youth science and technology innovation competition, and then went on to talk about the benefits, which caused some people to use their brains.

    The comments in this article are proposing that this matter should not end here, but should be a wake-up call, and the corresponding incident should be carefully found out and investigated in order to prevent the recurrence of the corresponding incident.

    About the development process of this matter, it is roughly like this: the student's award was questioned on the hot search, and the relevant local scientific research institute announced that the student was a child of the research institute. From the news released by the media, the student's thesis and the student's  The parents' research directions and published papers were very similar. Later, an investigation team was established. A few days later, the student's father issued a letter of apology. Also on the same day, the local government withdrew the award for the project.  This matter so far can be regarded as the end, perhaps it is the final result.  After a popular event ends, it is normal for the media to make a comment, and what you have to do is to learn how to write this comment, and this phenomenon, what normal people would probably think, the reason why they say this is because  You generally don't have any ideas, and you don't know what others will think, which may be because you have been too isolated from the world.

    The writing framework of the article is probably:

    The beginning outlines the end of the incident: the award was revoked, and the student's father issued a letter of apology.  Because it is at the end of public opinion, everyone knows what happened, so we only summarize the results, not the process.

    Then I talked about the social reaction to this result: it shows that the impact of this incident on society is negative.

    Then, the reasons for the negative impact are revealed: the "pure land of science and technology" is tarnished, "academic fraud" extends to elementary school students, and the phenomenon of "fighting fathers".

    Then start a serious analysis: explain the original intention of the science and technology prize competition for primary school students, what are the benefits of this, and what are the benefits??? is how to make people feel crooked.  Probably like this.

    Then I received all kinds of bad phenomena mentioned above and analyzed them again.

    After finishing speaking, click on the letter of apology from the parents of the students: talk about him from left to right.  But in fact, there is a problem that he didn't mention, that is, from the results of this process, it is obvious that the parent deliberately wrote the thesis to pave the way for the child, not because he didn't know that he could not write the paper as the letter of apology said.  And there is no news that this parent has been punished by the corresponding unit (when I write this, I am a little doubtful, will the parent be punished by the employer for such a thing? Or should he be punished?), maybe  Due to the limitation of the facts, the article as a media voice cannot say beyond words, so the end here only mentions a few sentences, and does not give targeted criticism or suggestions (such as thoroughly investigating and dealing with the words and deeds of parents),  I felt a little itchy in my heart.

    As a result, the author's suggestion is stated: relevant departments should thoroughly investigate all kinds of youth science competition projects, and don't allow fraud to undermine fairness and justice.  From this point of view, the most important mission of current reviews is not to expose evils, but to make suggestions.

    Finally, what is said "in the name of science", at first glance, it is very familiar. This tune makes people feel as if they have seen it somewhere, but they can't remember it for a while.

    Let's write a summary again:

    Overview of the end of the event.

    Societal Repercussions.

    Disadvantages.

    Analysis: The original intention of the event object, its pros and cons.

    Analysis of disadvantages.

    suggestion.

    end.

    In short, there must be a structure, there must be malpractice disclosure, and there must be suggestions.

    ? I just saw a news article on the official account saying that another province also had problems with corresponding student science and innovation award-winning works.

    In the end, it seemed that there was something else I wanted to say, but I forgot.  Let¡¯s do this first. This habit seems to be pretty good. After analyzing the writing method of the article, I have also paid attention to and sorted out an event from beginning to end.  (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report