Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Prose -> speak alone

.Further Discussion on the Fall of Leifeng Pagoda

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    ?

    On spoilers.

    At the beginning, let's talk about the reason of Leifeng Pagoda.  Mr. Chongxuan published a letter saying that the Leifeng Pagoda fell because of the superstition of the countrymen, thinking that taking a brick of the Leifeng Pagoda home would save the bad luck. That's how the Leifeng Pagoda was dug down.  He seemed to say in that article that the West Lake lost one scene, and that there were no more "ten sceneries", which led Lu Xun to discuss the "ten sceneries" again in the next paragraph, listing many examples of ten sceneries and eight sceneries, and then exposing  The reasons for the appearance of these sceneries are only made by elegant people, believers, and traditional masters. Now that the "ten sceneries" are gone, they will definitely not come up in the future.  This can be regarded as a superficial statement. Let me talk about this first, and then the latter is what I really want to criticize.  Speaking of it, this should be regarded as a feature of Lu Xun¡¯s commentary articles. What is really to be said is always put in the back. Before that, I always talk about some relatively simple truths. The latter is the same as the previous comments but more abstract.  of.

    Later, we will talk about spoilers.  First, let¡¯s talk about some foreign vandals. These vandals are doing great damage to bad things, even like general cleaning.  Then he said that it is a pity that China does not have such a saboteur (in fact, he is).  Then, they began to criticize Confucianism. To criticize something must go to the root, so Confucius, the ancestor of Confucianism, was criticized.  It seems to say that Confucius just said, never cursed, and acted like a good old man, and then he was called a saint.

    Then talk about tragedy, comedy, and irony.

    Then he said that the scene of Shiquan was destroyed, but the person who destroyed it was a robber.  The statement here is like the aforementioned Leifeng Pagoda was destroyed by countrymen and fell down.  It is China that was destroyed here, and those who destroyed China, from ancient times to the present, the Wuhu, Mongols, Manchus, and even the current Japanese, but after China was destroyed, they did not fundamentally abandon the old bad habits.  Repairing what has been damaged has been the case for thousands of years.  The point of view here is considered a bit of a novelty for you. When I used to take history classes, read history-related articles, watch historical documentaries, and even read nonsense comments on the Internet, they were all proud that China could not be changed, saying what all the people who tried to change China  , most have been changed by China, and I am extremely proud of this.  First time seeing someone criticize this.  That's true. When you say that a high civilization assimilates a barbaric civilization, it is actually because the ideological decay is too deep, and nothing can destroy this decay.  From this point of view, destruction is actually good or bad, depending on what is being destroyed.

    What I mentioned above is the destruction of bandits, that is, the destruction caused by invaders. The next thing is domestic destruction, slave-style destruction. These destructions are driven by small profits, but there are many people who destroy them.  It is very big, just like the destruction of Leifeng Pagoda by the countrymen.

    Where there is destruction, there is new construction, but there is no new construction for the above two.  What many people have been able to do from ancient times to the present is only to repair the old routines in the collapsed rubble.

    The last paragraph is about hope, the real innovator, the real destroyer, the person who can really build new buildings in the midst of destruction.

    Summary: There are three types of destruction, destruction from the outside, and destruction from the inside to destroy and decay.

    Write a summary, use facts to reason, and when the facts are explained clearly, the abstract principles will naturally be understood.

    As for what to learn, in fact, you can't learn anything, because you can't have such thoughts.  Conception is only an aid, and what is eternal is thought.  (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report