This is the ownership of the copyright of ordinary service works. Li Shanjia Film Studio arranged for employees to create scripts for Jiang Ge who was rescued to shoot the film, but did not agree on the ownership of the copyright of the scripts. Can. The script will belong to ordinary job works. Its copyright belongs to the author. Shansuo enjoys a right in unit A film studio, Zhi has provided Jia with the ambition of the work, within two years A has priority to use the whole within the scope of the owner's business. Therefore, within this two-year period, the copyright has not been approved by Party A, and no third party is allowed to use it in the same way within the business scope of Party A. Of course, within these two years, with the permission of the family, a third party can be allowed to use the work in the same way as the unit, but the income should be the same as that of Jia and Li Fen. The unit she wants the right to do is only within two years. The priority right to use the business aspect is to set it as a movie to be responsible for the distribution. Therefore, it has the right not to ask A's permission. License this script to a third party for publication. That's fine. The second type of service work is the special service work. The copyright of special service works belongs to the unit. The author only wants to have three rights, first, the right of authorship, second, the right to receive rewards, and third, or hold it out. If the unit permits others to use the special service work, it receives remuneration or transfers it. Authors should be paid a certain amount. The copyright of works for special duties belongs to the unit. The author only enjoys three rights: first, the right of authorship; second, the right to receive rewards. Third, the remuneration obtained by the unit that transfers the copyright to others and licenses it to others should be paid. Those who want to do it pay a certain percentage. Works for special duties need to meet three conditions. Only then did he become a special duty work. The genre of the first work is. Works that cannot be completed by one's own strength. Including engineering design drawings, product design drawings, maps, computer software. Such works as large encyclopedias. The second condition is that for such a work, it is the responsibility of the unit. If someone wants to sue this work for infringement, the infringement responsibility is borne by the unit, not by the owner. The author is responsible. Third, it mainly uses the material and technical conditions of the unit. Job works that meet these three conditions are called special job works, and their copyright belongs to Title 64 of 2006. Liu Maoling, a game software engineer of Company A, developed the game software of Kingdom Romance in his spare time, which was illegally copied by Company B. The villa shop purchased the pirated software at a low price from unlicensed dealers. Ding Company B-C Bookstore. Ding Gong purchased the software from C Bookstore at a normal price, and installed it on the game consoles he operated. Which of the following statements are correct? This software is not a work for employment, so its copyright belongs to Liu Maoxiang. He is not a work for hire. He was developed by Liu in his spare time. Therefore, a is wrong, and Company A should reward Niu. a is wrong only special. For service works, the original copyright belongs to the unit, and the author enjoys the right of authorship, the right to receive rewards, and the right to receive remuneration. This is not a job work at all, nor is it a special job work. Therefore, A does not need to talk about cattle hair. Then the total illegal copying of you violated Liu's copying rights and distribution rights in his copyrights. I was sick and bought the pirated software at a low price from the endless book list for sale. Then the software sold by Bookstore C is the sale of pirated software C. Infringed on Niu Mao's copyright. C's sales than the bookstore's sales behavior violated Niu Mao's copyright, but the bookstore was sick because of the hairstyle in it. Is trying to work sales. They also sell pirated software, and the sellers of Screen Bookstore are malicious sellers. He is at fault for infringing the copyright of Niu Mao. On the one hand, Bing Bookstore has infringed on the distribution rights of Niu Mao's copyrights by selling pirated software, and on the other hand, he is only a salesman for development. He was at fault for infringing on Liu's distribution rights by his sales behavior, so the disease bookstore should not only bear the responsibility of stopping the infringement, but also bear the infringer's responsibility for damages. Option b is correct, as evidenced by the fact that the bookstore should bear legal responsibilities such as compensation for losses. Ding bookstore. The software he copied was pirated software, and Ding's copying behavior violated the copying right in Niumen's copyright. Ting Ting is a bona fide infringer. He bought pirated software from formal channels at market prices, and explained the product provider to the light box right holder. The reproduction right among the copyrights of cattle and horses violated by a selected copying act. But he was a bona fide infringer, and Ding Zhi was responsible for infringing on Liu's copyright with neither intention nor negligence. Removal of copies of pirated software stops liability for infringement. And as a bona fide infringement in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the "Computer Software Protection Regulations". Bin is not liable for damages. who is right? d, choose a total of the civil standards that C Bookstore should bear the joint infringement. Who are you? Joint infringement requires subjective joint intention and joint negligence. For example, start buying from unlicensed dealers. Why does he have no joint intention subjectively, (Remember the website website: www.hlnovel.com