-
Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading
Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Romance -> full-time artist Chapter 488 So I dug a hole a long time ago
Previous page Return to Catalog Next page
- Yes, everyone has reacted!
Among the cases solved by Poirot, it is the most famous and most talked about by readers¡ª¡ª
It's "Murder on the Orient Express"!
In "Murder on the Orient Express", Poirot chose to let the murderer go.
Because the law cannot sanction the murderer who is at large, a group of people took up the butcher knife and killed the murderer with a shocking partnership.
Control violence with violence!
After Poirot found out the truth, he hesitated for a long time, but in the end he did not report this group of people.
The way Poirot handled it at the time caused controversy.
But in "The Curtain", another murderer who cannot be sanctioned by law appeared.
The murderer used the psychological weakness of others to instigate others to kill, while he himself stood on the sidelines from a distance.
It can be called an outlaw fanatic!
He even provoked Poirot's friend Hastings to kill someone!
If Poirot hadn't noticed, Hastings would have become a murderer.
If Poirot can't sanction the opponent, the opponent will only continue to go crazy.
Under such circumstances, Poirot made the same choice as the murderers in "Murder on the Orient Express"¡ª¡ª
Control violence with violence!
? For better or worse.
This behavior at least did not violate Poirot's character design, but made Poirot's character design stronger!
Yes.
He can forgive those people, because at the same dark moment, he will make the same extreme choice!
And the difference is that
Poirot could forgive others for using violence to punish the murderer, but he could not forgive himself for using this method.
So after he killed the murderer, he committed suicide without hesitation.
He is using his own way to die with the murderer!
And this is precisely the greatness of Poirot!
Be aware of this.
Many people were silent.
In response to Chu Kuang's scolding, he suddenly fell silent.
With that story as the background, many people's criticisms are not true at all.
It's just that everyone didn't expect it.
It turns out that Chu Kuang had already shown this to everyone in "Murder on the Orient Express", and he had already been digging holes.
The difference is that after that group of people used violence to control violence, they still wanted to live.
Poirot, on the other hand, chose to use death as his salvation.
He felt guilty about himself.
He violated the code of his life.
When he made this decision, he negated the most steadfast thing in his detective career.
But this is Poirot!
The significance of this layout is so profound that it can almost shock people's hearts!
The seemingly unconnected stories have formed a complete chain of thinking because of two choices with the same purpose¡ª¡ª
Echoed around!
And when making these two choices, Poirot said four words repeatedly.
"I have no idea¡¡"
He didn't know how to deal with others, and he didn't know whether his choice was correct.
There is no case in the world that can stump Poirot.
What stumped him was only the contradictions in human nature.
Is this ending acceptable now?
Readers don't know either.
But the scolding has indeed become smaller and smaller.
The reader's riot gradually subsided because of the "Murder on the Orient Express" mentioned in a cold light.
At this time.
Suddenly someone said: "I don't support Poirot's approach, but this does not prevent me from continuing to love him. He will always be the king of detectives in my mind."
It's like a chain reaction.
More and more readers agree:
"Using Poirot's own words in the book, maybe this is his retribution, so in the end Poirot also fell into a distant reincarnation. When Fajin lost his meaning, Poirot raised the gun he had planned for a long time, and then represented what he thought justice shot."
"I love him more."
"But this ending is indeed too cruel for Poirot. He has been pursuing the truth all his life, but in the final analysis he is still pursuing the justice of Fazi. In the end, he ended up in the most tragic way."
"He is very old, he is still so wise, but his body can't support it anymore."
"It is people like Poirot who make us? Standing in the sun all the time. "
"I really like Poirot!"
""
may still be controversial.
But compared to the crazy riots of the readers, everyone who has calmed down can already accept Poirot's choice.
At the same time, I also accepted this ending.
It is worth mentioning that when Agatha's "Curtain" was published, she was no longer alive, so there was no incident of readers jumping.
but¡¡
To use the reader's ridicule, "capital crimes can be avoided and living crimes cannot escape."
No matter how well Chu Kuang handled this ending, it can't change the fact that he gave readers a knife in the finale.
"This old thief is too bad!"
"Totally teased us in the palm of our hands."
"It is estimated that he is complacent. You see, "Murder on the Orient Express" has already hinted at Poirot's ending. Sooner or later, Poirot will welcome his own redemption."
"I hate the old thief!"
"Next time the old thief throws a knife, quickly hold him down!"
"Damn, this has become a meme. Every time I watch a movie or TV series, I feel that the creator is going to throw a knife, and there will be comments saying that I should hold down the hand of the old thief Chu Kuang."
""
This is also true.
The current Chu Kuang, in the minds of readers, is a bit like the old man of the earth.
Lao Xu refers to the neon playwright and novelist Xu Yuanxuan.
?Because the stories written by this person are more serious and have strong logical thinking editing ability, which makes people fall into deep thought after reading and gives people a kind of spiritual baptism, so the readers evaluate it very highly.
However, success is also old, and failure is also old.
Although Lao Xu's works are wonderful, they basically adhere to the dark writing style. If you don't post a box, you will feel uncomfortable, so that everyone must keep a nervous heart when reading Lao Xu's works, because readers will never know what they like. When will your character receive bento.
Isn't it the same for Chu Kuang?
Readers never expected that Poirot would die at the end of "Detective Poirot"!
How could he!
How dare he!
Poirot's popularity belongs to the extremely high category among reasoning fans, and normal authors dare not play like this.
He is the only one who dares to dare!
? It is not only the readers who are physically and mentally exhausted, but many writers and editors in the industry feel very speechless¡ª¡ª
"horrible."
"This old thief is not wronged."
"I thought that writing Baguio to death was his limit, but I didn't expect him to dare to write Poirot to death."
"Baguio is not the main character after all, so if he writes it to death, he will write it to death. I didn't expect that he would dare to attack the main character!"
"The key is that Baguio's popularity was not high before his death, but Poirot's popularity was at its peak before his death!"
"Chu Kuang is really crazy, but also really arrogant. He really deserves to be a man who is one-on-one in fairy tales!"
"Too fierce!"
"These other authors are careful to curry favor with readers these days, but he is the only one who plays tricks on readers' nerves every day."
There have been two reader riots in the fiction world
The first time was because of Chu Kuang, and the second time was because of Chu Kuang.
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ª
ps: Ask for a monthly pass.
If you like full-time artists, please collect them: full-time artists update the fastest. (Remember the site URL: www.hlnovel.com - Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report
- Previous pageCatalogNext page