-
Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading
Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Historic -> smart factory Text Chapter 1371 Species Evolution
Previous page Return to Catalog Next page
- Chapter 1371 Species Evolution
Brophy went on to make another key discovery: one of the boulder lines represented the center of the Milky Way¡ªits straight line marked a spring conjunction of the center of the Galaxy around 17,700 B.C. Lift. Surprisingly, the direction of the galactic plane in the statue is consistent with this period.
Therefore, Brophy concluded that the stone statue was a map of the Milky Way with the northern galactic pole observed.
Then, he turned his attention to the second pile of rocks excavated by Wendorf's team. Similarly, they did not find any bodies in this pile of rocks.
The size and placement of this pile of rocks indicate that it is a map of the Andromeda Galaxy. Statistics show that it is twice the size of the Milky Way, and its location is similar to the size and location of the Andromeda Galaxy we know. consistent.
As for the other stone piles in Nabtapurnaya, they have not yet been excavated
Brophy also conducted duli research on Giza, where he also found evidence that the designers of Giza also knew about the galactic center. Brophy's powerful software allowed him to refine Robert Bovar's relative dates for the Great Pyramid.
He agreed that the famous star tunnel served as a marker through which a narrow opening could be used to determine the ri. When Brophy studied the skies over Giza, he found that the best axial alignment ever seen here was around 2360 B.C., about half a century later than the period identified by Bovar.
Bovar believes that when the pyramid was being built, the passage on the south wall of the king's funeral chamber was aligned with the constellation Orion. But Brophy discovered that the last star in Orion's Belt, Betelgeuse, was aligned with the Southern Passage more than a century ago
When the pyramid was built, the southern starlight channel was aligned with the center of the Milky Way. It also supports his findings at Nabtapurnaya.
Assuming that the buildings on the Giza plateau are a mirror of the Orion galaxy, when did this happen? The ri period that Bovar speculated was 10,500 BC, when the three stars of Orion reached due south during the precession cycle of 26,000 years. This was much earlier than when the pyramids were actually built.
When Brophy tested this idea, he discovered another dimension to this complex problem. He found that the ground at Giza reflected the sky at two points in time, 11,772 BC and 9,420 BC.
Brophy believes that the construction of the pyramid does not reflect the time when Orion was due south of the three stars as Bowar speculated, but includes the entire process of the formation of this phenomenon. These two periods also included another important event, the galactic center being due north around 11,000 BC.
? In other words, Giza was built as a zodiac clock, reflecting the precessional cycles in stone and ground. This supports the idea that the astronomy of this site predates the actual construction of the pyramids.
Brophy was fully aware of the revolutionary nature of his views. So he wisely refrained from drawing final conclusions in the book. He simply viewed his findings as a hypothesis and suggested that others conduct further research.
Fortunately, most of his ideas are testable.
So far. Only twenty-five Nabutabunaya boulders have been identified via GPS, and of at least thirty stone piles, only two have been excavated. I suspect that as time goes by, it will tell us more information about human beings.
When most of us humans cannot accept the existence of ancient civilization or supernatural civilization. How much acceptance do you have of China¡¯s technology?
??This makes much of real history now look like a fairy tale. When the existence of ancient civilization makes it difficult for this generation of humans who are bound by traditional education to believe it, they have to reject technology again.
?Similar to the Montauk Project, energy technology, Mars immigration, alien protocols, etc.
¡°For example, both acetone and ultrasonic waves may become ways to produce nuclear fusion, which will eliminate the need for expensive tokamak magnetic control vessels that cost millions of dollars. It's just going to be done on a desktop.
Acoustic fusion is a generated word that means "nuclear fusion generated from sound." certainly. This word only partially sums up the truth of the matter.
Acoustic fusion is an emerging field of chemistry. The direct product of sonochemistry mainly comes from a special phenomenon, sonoluminescence.
Under certain temperature and pressure conditions, bombarding an appropriate liquid, such as acetone, with ultrasonic waves will produce sonoluminescence.
Sound waves will cause the generation of several small bubbles, just like those bubbles produced by a toothbrush when we brush our teeth. The difference is that these bubbles contain huge energy.
When these bubbles burst?, part of their energy is released as light, which is where the phenomenon gets its name, sonoluminescence.
The concept of sonofusion comes from the fact that during the sonoluminescence process, very high temperatures and pressures will be formed inside these bubbles. If deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen, which can undergo thermonuclear reactions, is added to this medium.
?????????????????? Then use a neutron pulse to shock this already very strong pressure mixture, which is enough to cause a nuclear fusion reaction.
?????????? In summary, this is acoustic fusion. However, this work was fraught with controversy both before and after its publication.
Scientologists like to describe themselves as an evolving, open, and free-wheeling exploration of the nature, structure, and function of things, from the smallest to the largest, and their interactions with each other, from From the simplest to the most complex, science is limited only by honesty, experimentation, peer review, and repeatable experimental results.
This is the standard of scientific work described by "distinguished scientists". They may not be scientific researchers in the true sense, but may just be defenders of scientism who abuse and denigrate all explanations of their "scientific teachings" phenomena and things.
In fact, the papal staff in the Western Middle Ages. Also doing similar things.
Unfortunately, the world of science is more like a cross between a super prison and a mental hospital.
At all times, scientism has been defined according to some dogmatic views. To cast doubt on this definition, the practitioners of dogma go further and say: Dogma is everywhere.
Schools will only teach truth using prescribed methods, three examples: the Earth is flat, Ptolemaic astronomy, or Darwinism.
Heaven helps those who threaten the standard model. Now in most cases it is the egos of authoritative scientific institutions that play a role. In the past it was often external security services and the Inquisition that called the shots, sometimes with fatal consequences. For example, Giordano Bruno was considered a madman by people at the time because he insisted on the theory of ruthlessness and was burned at the stake.
In contemporary real life. Science is a small follower of the state and the economy, relying on funding from both, as well as other types of support. They dominate everything, and science can only dance to their tune.
Because scientific work requires a lot of capital. Sometimes this includes equipment costing billions and expensive academic and engineering talent. and a large amount of expensive experimental equipment and supplies.
Starting from Hitler, it has become a tradition and practice for the state to host large-scale scientific and technological research projects. The government is the largest investor in science. The government not only employs a large number of scientists in several institutions and laboratories, but also funds commercialization. and industrialization of science and technology development, while also funding basic theoretical research.
The result is to cultivate a large number of docile and docile scientists, rather than autonomous explorers with a spirit of freedom. These scientists' jobs are to make no mistakes, keep their bosses happy, protect their organizations from other illegitimate forces, advance their careers, and expand their organizations.
The same goes for this governing body. Why bloated? Why are people so busy? Because you can¡¯t find anyone who made a mistake or someone who dares to take responsibility. A certain big country in a certain era. The situation is even worse. Most of the people who come out of domestic education are traitors, slaves and the like.
Among these many responsibilities, today they are focusing on another one, which is to protect their patent rights from taxpayer-supported research.
Such an atmosphere is obviously not conducive to cultivating an open spirit of investigation and sharing of knowledge. Continuously added rules such as security classification, trade secrets, and protection of patent rights have undoubtedly made this atmosphere worse.
¡°Those scientists who oppose the system, or who actually ask questions, are subject to these forces. They can be stripped of their right to attend professional conferences, or barred from holding conferences of their own.
They will be denied their progress; their work will not be published, they will be informally banned, they will be removed from scientific organizations, they will be censured, or they will be fired, or worse.
The most radical scientists are always threatened and intimidated, their laboratories are illegally invaded or destroyed, and they are even assassinated. Some of them were imprisoned, others had their writings and experimental equipment confiscated and destroyed.
The more basic and breakthrough scientific discoveries are, the greater the threat they pose and the more intense the bombardment they receive. In such attacks, the power of the media, the scientific community and the public is the most important.
Vested interests in society, including high-level politicians and big capitalists, usually dominate the scientific war to the end.Who wins and who loses also determines the reputation of both parties. This is why it is so important to control publishing and journalism.
In the Chinese Federation, this is the difference between most public schools and private schools. Public schools are funded by the state and tuition is free, but the problem is the content and results of education.
Most students don¡¯t even know what politeness is, what science is, what true knowledge is, and what quality is. They just received a specious so-called quality education, and then became the ideal pawns, spare parts, and cannon fodder of the imperial court.
If a scientist or a scientific organization anywhere in the world decides to test a specific scientific hypothesis. They will carefully confirm this hypothesis with a controllable experiment, or first make this hypothesis and all the data of this experiment will be meticulously recorded.
The findings and pros and cons will also be presented in formal scientific papers. Of course, usually, the completion of such an experiment must be subject to internal investigations by various government agencies.
The paper will then be submitted to editors of scientific journals in the field related to the discovery. This editor then sends the paper to a group of relevant scientists. This group of scientists is generally anonymous to the public
duyidu.
Read it
The paper will be reviewed by this group of scientists, who will check whether it is scientifically solid work and has the correct structure and experimental data. Whether the identifiable tendencies and errors of the paper have been explained, etc. The main thing is that they need to clearly see if there are any violations of the rules.
The comments from this group of scientists will eventually be fed back to the editor, who will then decide whether to refuse publication, allow the author to make partial revisions, or publish the full text.
Once approved, it will be published. This is the entire process, and other publications are similar.
Charles Darwin was full of enthusiasm for observing nature, and he also studied the origin of all things deeply. He set off a revolution in biology, and his book "The Origin of Species" is basically a knowledge category that is very popular in primary and secondary schools in most countries in the world.
Makoshi was a keen social observer who also had serious thoughts on the origin of species. This great man revolutionized economics and politics. Both men were "giants" of the 19th century. It has a profound impact on future generations. At the same time, they all deeply agreed with dialectical materialism.
Materialism believes that matter is the only subject of change, and all changes are the result of the inherent internal contradictions of things.
In certain eras, materialist dialectics has great appeal to intellectuals and the working class. In fact, it has always been questioned. Especially in the last century.
Darwinism began to find itself in a similar predicament. It wasn¡¯t just creationists who sounded the death knell for it. Darwin himself was well aware of the flaws in evolution.
Darwin once called the origin of flowering plants a "nuisance mystery" that remains unsolved.
In order to solve this "nasty puzzle", scientists have spent hundreds of years painstakingly searching for fossil remains, trying to find the missing link from non-flowering plants to flowering plants.
Unfortunately, a lot of doubts have cropped up in this process. Darwin had anticipated the problems caused by the absence of transitional fossils. He wrote at the time: "This is a most serious problem that is enough to overthrow the entire theory."
This is definitely not as simple as a missing link.
With the advancement of science and technology. A biochemist becomes one of the pioneers in overturning the theory of evolution. His name was Michael Bach, a biology professor. Wrote the book "Darwin's Black Box".
In the book, Bach pointed out that a strange brewing bubble appeared in the test tube.
He focused on five phenomena: blood imprints, eyelashes, the human immune system, transport of substances in cells, and synthesized nucleotides.
He systematically analyzed each phenomenon and came to a shocking conclusion: these systems are so complex that the gradual, step-by-step path of evolution claimed by the theory of evolution simply cannot reach this level.
The basis of the theory of evolution is very simple, perhaps too simple. Its theoretical basis is: the evolution of life on earth is achieved through a series of biological changes. These biological changes are the result of the joint action of natural selection and random genetic mutations.
As time goes by, one creature gradually changes into another creature. In the process of adapting to environmental changes, the most suitable populations survive and reproduce, while the populations that cannot adapt gradually die out.
This forms the most famous principle of evolution: survival of the fittest.
For example, today's human beings, your brain, internal organs, digestive system, and even toes all evolved from simple randomness at the beginning. From the simplest to complex, then this earth is too perfect, perfect. He created randomly generated humans, transformed from monkeys. The question is, is this assumption true?
Like many great minds, Darwin's theory of evolution is extremely simple. He observed that all species are mutating, some are larger, some are smaller, some are fatter, some are lighter in color, etc
Darwin believed that because limited food laws satisfy all living things, those species with stronger vitality will have a chance to survive and reproduce through struggle than those with weaker vitality.
If a species is genetic, then the species will change after a period of time. The larger the time interval, the greater the change.
For more than a century, most scientists have believed that virtually all living things, at least all of their important characteristics, result from natural selection through random variation.
Darwin¡¯s ideas have been used to explain phenomena such as bird beaks, horse hooves, the color of moths, insect slaves, the distribution of living things on the earth, and the age of living creatures.
His theory has even been used by some scientists to explain human behavior, such as why desperate people commit suicide, why teenagers give birth out of wedlock, why some students score better on intelligence tests than others, why religious priests refuse to get married and have children, etc.
All organisms, all ideas, all feelings and thoughts are not the subject of evolution.
In the nearly a century and a half since Darwin launched his theory, evolutionary biology has made great strides in the types of organisms we see around us.
To many, this progress may seem like a complete victory, but the real work of studying living things, in terms of animals or organisms as a whole, has yet to begin.
The most important parts of living things are still so tiny that people can¡¯t see them. There are many tiny things in living things, and those related to the tiny things in living things are molecules. To be continued. ) - Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report
- Previous pageCatalogNext page