Speaking of which, what Su Bancheng said at this time was actually a clear understanding of some of the mainland's film markets. Although he did not pay much attention to the mainland's film market, this development Su Bancheng still relatively understood the overall process. Moreover, in such a situation, what Su Bancheng said himself was not wrong at all. On such a matter, in fact, on such a point, they themselves thought of such a thing The problem is that it is such a simple thing.
"A thing like this actually won't change the problem at all. After all, the economy has developed. At this time, the pursuit of filmmakers has changed. There is nothing wrong with this. .
After all, it means that the entire social environment has changed during this time. Therefore, if some of the filmmakers¡¯ habits have changed during this process, it won¡¯t be a big deal. thing.
In the middle of such a process, in fact, a clear question they thought of during this time is that it is such a simple thing. People's pursuits change with the development of society.
Of course, it also changes with the development of one's own abilities. This is something that no one can control.
Wang Haidong himself is from the Mainland, and he actually knows the Mainland film market very well. In the middle of such a process, in fact, one of the clear questions they thought of during this process was that this is A simple thing. One of their own problems with this kind of thing is that it has changed the entire social environment.
Just like what Su Bancheng said himself, in the beginning, these filmmakers were actually doing things for the people wholeheartedly, and they also wanted to do something about this problem wholeheartedly. good movie. Make movies for the common people.
Whether it¡¯s a director or an actor, they all think like this at a time like this. After all, if they really let go and make movies, the 1980s was just the beginning.
In the early 1990s, the entire market environment was truly determined. At times like this, mainland filmmakers just want to calm down and make some good movies.
They did not have any selfish motives at that time, and they did a very good job on such an issue.
But at this time, we can actually see that changes in the entire society will have very big changes for filmmakers, and this is about an issue like this. In fact, at this time, one of the questions they thought of was that it was such a simple thing. In the beginning, it was for work, and really for good movies that the common people could see. This was the biggest goal in the minds of filmmakers at the time.
But as society slowly develops, things like this will actually change.
And what¡¯s more, when they think about such a question, they think clearly about what they need in their hearts. In the beginning, of course they need to make good movies, movies that people like to watch. This is their goal. When it comes to such things, one of the things they think of is that they will do it with their heart.
At that time, there was no temptation of great financial benefits. Even at that time, some filmmakers would spend their own money to buy costumes and other things. That was because they really wanted to make good movies. But then the economy slowly developed. In other words, everyone's goals have undergone fundamental changes.
Later, everyone said that they started doing it for money and profit. Fighting for fame. At a time like this, movies have begun to become a tool for some filmmakers, which is very bad.
¡° Once a movie is reduced to a tool in such a situation, it means that it has lost its original meaning. One of the questions they thought about when it came to such a thing was that it was about such a simple thing, in such a situation. In fact, a movie is a movie, once it is reduced to a tool for some filmmakers. At this time, the movie itself has actually undergone fundamental changes.
When it comes to such a question, in fact, when they think of such a question, it is about what can I get from such a movie, not about such a situation. What can be expressed through this movie?
This kind of thing is actually putting the cart before the horse.
First of all, a movie is a movie made for the common people. What kind of meaning does the filmmaker want to express through his movie? This kind of thing is actually the most important situation. In such a situation, Well, actually at this point, no matter what it is, it is a relatively bad omen.
¡° Once it is said that movies have become a tool for some filmmakers, at least in such a situation, the movie violates the meaning of its existence. This is actually very obvious. If it is said that at this time, the filmmakers of a movie are making movies for the common people, then how to shoot a movie like this is actually very simple.
What kind of filming is beneficial to the movie? Whether it is the selection of actors or the focus of investment, some of these things are actually what they think about on this issue. It's such a simple thing. All of this is to make a good movie.
¡°But if it is said that once movies become a tool for some people, then in such a matter, this issue will actually change fundamentally.
At times like this, once the movie becomes a tool for some people. In such a situation, who will direct the movie and who will star in it will all be involved.
In fact, this kind of thing is very common when it comes to such a problem. One of the things that everyone thinks about such a problem is that if we don¡¯t think about such a problem from the perspective of a movie, then such a thing is actually a very big problem in itself. big problem.
At this time, one of the things they thought of was such a simple thing. A fundamental change at this point is that this matter has deviated from the meaning of the movie itself.
Of course, in fact, as time changes, at this time, everyone will increasingly feel that movies are a tool. In fact, such a problem is also very normal.
¡°After all, no one can be so selfless, whether it¡¯s a producer or a director. Actors, even those who are extras, actually have their own selfish motives.
It¡¯s just that in the past, although these people had selfish motives. But under the circumstances at that time. Everyone is working wholeheartedly for the movie. Even if it is said that posterity is selfish, when it comes to such a matter, in fact, everyone suppresses their selfishness and does not express it. .
But in such a situation, everyone suppressed it, which actually does not mean that everyone does not have some kind of selfishness. But later with the development of economy. Everyone has also begun to put economic interests first. Under such a situation, as the environment of the entire society slowly begins to undergo such changes, it is actually also true for such an issue. Something started to change. In such a matter, the filmmakers began to expose their selfishness.
¡°At times like this, they actually don¡¯t have any more thoughts on making movies for the common people. At this time, what they think about is saying that they can become famous and how much money they can make. This is very important. In fact, in the middle of such a process, some things during this period will not have any big impact. Anyway, everyone is the same. Now everyone has selfish motives. Therefore, no one should criticize anyone at a time like this. This seems to have become an unspoken rule among filmmakers.
During such a process, in fact, when it comes to self-installing and maintaining a house, everything becomes selfish. This is also in line with the current environment. Although it is said that everyone does not really take such a thing into their hearts, in such a situation, in fact, their own behavior at such a time is that it is not a big deal.
And it means that everyone is like this when things like this, that is, it has become a habit, and everyone is like this. If it is said that you are not like this, it seems to mean that this is fundamentally the case in such a thing. situation. Their own performance on such a question is that they are talking about such a simple thing. At this time, in fact, the change that more people expressed was such a simple thing.
?In fact, not many people will delve into such a matter at all. After all, everyone is in the circle now, and they are all filmmakers. You are doing it for selfishness, and I am doing it for selfishness, everyone. As long as you know in your heart what it is like, as for what kind of movie can be shot at a time like this, it is actually very difficult to say at a time like this. .
No matter what it is, in fact, on this issue, it is very important for filmmakers to make movies for the common people. If you want to make a good movie, you must do it this way.
When they think about such a thing, they have a clear understanding that they are talking about the changes in such a simple issue. In fact, such a change fundamentally raises a question that is so direct, making movies for the common people? Nowadays, how many filmmakers can really do this? Will the people invest in making movies for you?
It is obviously impossible. Therefore, in such a situation, in fact, the strong passion they showed on such an issue also means that things are not as simple as imagined.
¡°Obviously ordinary people are not producers or directors. They are not big-name celebrities, but if a movie wants to be successfully filmed, it must actually rely on such people for such a thing. Such a situation is originally so simple. If you make movies for the common people, you can indeed make good movies. There is no doubt about this.
In such a situation, in fact, the question they thought of was such a simple matter. Under such circumstances, they actually still rely on the producer's money when making a movie, so. At times like this, movies have become a tool for some filmmakers. If I invest, that means whoever I want will star.
No matter whether this actor is definitely suitable for this movie or not, I have invested money and I have to have a say. Whoever I want to star in the movie will definitely star in it.
Therefore, when it comes to things like this, today¡¯s filmmakers are actually beginning to say that they are no longer the same as those in the past.
¡° Making a movie now is not about whether you as an actor are suitable for such a movie, but about who will invest in this movie. This is actually a very important thing.
In such a situation, in fact, more people express an understanding that they are talking about the gap in their own thinking about such a problem.
¡°And that¡¯s to say, when it comes to things like this, sometimes it¡¯s not about doing it for the sake of the movie at all. Rather, I am making movies purely for my own benefit, my own private benefit. Nowadays, there are quite a few mainland movies. It¡¯s even said that most of the photos were taken in this way. It¡¯s really hard to say whether such a shooting technique can produce a good movie.
¡°It doesn¡¯t mean that you can shoot a classic movie in any situation. If it¡¯s not about making movies in a down-to-earth manner. Basically, it is not possible to shoot a classic when things are like this. Filmmakers in Europe and the United States have done quite well on this issue.
A leatherworker is a producer. You just say you invest money. As for how to make a good movie, the person who is responsible for the movie is the director. The director wants to make a good movie and afford the producer's money. , this is enough.
But in such a situation, if we are talking about the mainland, such a matter is actually not such a simple matter. Many producers also like to intervene in such an issue. Movie thing.
This is actually for their own selfish reasons. In fact, the only role of the producer in this situation is to control investment. But in the Mainland, generally speaking, investors will often interfere with film affairs. Although it is possible for something like this to happen in Europe and the United States, generally speaking, the producer only intervenes when he discovers some non-technical problems.
As for technical issues, generally speaking, it is the director who has the final say. No matter what the director does, it all revolves around the movie and how to shoot a good movie. Come.
And it means that in a question of such a question, it??At this time, the question they thought of was such a simple thing. At this time, one way they thought of was to say it was so simple.
But in mainland China, these things are hard to say. How to choose actors generally depends on the director's vision. In this case, the director will choose what kind of actors he wants. The look of an actor.
This is the director¡¯s understanding of the movie. In the director¡¯s understanding, he will choose what kind of actors are most suitable for his movie.
But at this time, the producer is actually the boss. If the producer wants to use whom he does not want to use, then there is no big problem. In such a matter, everything is so simple. , if I invested money, of course I would have a certain say in such a matter.
And talking about such a problem, in fact, if it has developed to the present, it is not just a matter of the producer selecting actors, but also the director selecting actors, then in this way One of the things mentioned above is actually not that pure.
When asked about a question like this, one of the questions they thought of was whether it would benefit me. This is also a criterion for the director to select actors. In other words, this movie has become a tool for the producer and director, which is actually very obvious. (To be continued)