The media and the public were in a state of confusion. The two facs of Ye Wei and "Ramnik" both made people laugh, wonder and curse.
The Weimi people were naturally relieved that it was just a false alarm. Some people enjoyed the fun. Look at the Weihei people who were getting angry and scolded, as if they had their front teeth broken by a punch! They were all really fooled by viy. Some people are dissatisfied, Brother Wei, what are you doing? Everyone has been fooled, and is this really okay?
Compared with the embarrassment, the Weihei people were stunned and continued to attack, ridiculing this behavior as boring and childish. Ye Wei was indeed an idiot!
Some online media people also criticized Ye Wei for doing this, which is almost tantamount to spreading rumors. Today is not April Fool's Day. What he did was ruining his justice and pushing himself to the opposite side. Therefore, some black media made a fool of themselves, but it also made those media who helped him feel anxious. Don't make it so that others can't help even if they want to.
Everyone knows that Ye Wei will definitely come up with an explanation. I didn¡¯t have to wait long. A few hours after the prank was revealed, almost early in the morning, there was an update on Ye Wei¡¯s social networking site:
¡¾Wow! What happened to the "Lou Ramnik Incident" today? It's simple, as you can see.
Lu is really a film critic. In fact, he often goes to Rotten Tomatoes to review movies. He just doesn't work for a gossip newspaper. I actually gave him a gift and asked him to write a good movie review for me. I also had to find him in the yellow pages in the middle of the night, and then rush from the hotel to Lu's house to watch the movie first and then comment on it. Lu likes my new movie very much, and he would give it full marks even without a gift. But I ruined his dream, how could I not make some compensation?
In any case, this is not a lie, every word we say from beginning to end is composed of sincerity, Lu also introduced himself in his profile. However, this sincerity seems to be too obvious, which makes some people think of lies, and the bribery that was not mentioned anywhere becomes the "truth."
This is about the attitude towards things. I very much agree with Bethany Hamilton's words: "When you are very close to something, it is difficult to see what it really was or is now. (ething, its-hard- to-É«e-things-as-they-ture-were-or-are.)" You know, don't just look at the appearance you see at first glance, but look at it from multiple angles and look at it with your heart. , otherwise you will be easily deceived by yourself, and liars are called clich¨¦s.
Maybe some people scold me, "It's not you who misled me!" People are misled by all kinds of things to influence their ideas and cognition, so it's so easy to be deceived! This is the scariest thing.
¡°Hmm¡someone seemed to ask me if I was referring to the critical review controversy of ¡°Soul Surfer¡±. Yes! That¡¯s right! The generally negative reviews from film critics are misleading some viewers, not the majority of viewers who generally praise it highly. Some critics complained that the movie was a lie, that Bethenny was fake and everyone acted and said fake things.
I can¡¯t agree with that at all. First, why? Why is Bethany¡¯s mentality and behavior fake? None of the negative reviews gave a convincing reason. They only said that it was because of "simplicity", "the characters are too smart", "lack of real feelings", "too much religious sentiment"
Excuse me? Please allow me to interrupt, Bethany is a very devout Christian, and religious emotions are the backbone of her inner world. This movie tells her story. It is impossible for me to explore the cause and effect. I can only and only want to truthfully reflect her inner face.
I¡¯m an agnostic, but you and I both know that religious belief is everything to some people, and Bethenny never denies that.
"Too many religious sentiments" cannot be the reason for criticizing it as a bad movie, because this is Bethany's story as it is, and it is true. But I'm not boasting. Religious background will not affect a viewer's ability to gain strength from "Soul Surfer". It is definitely not a simple story.
Another group of film critics criticized it as chicken soup for the soul that ignores the pain of reality. Maybe it¡¯s because the pain peak of the film didn¡¯t meet their needs. Bethany cried and rolled from one end of the beach to the other, and then stood up after being bruised and bruised. The problem is that it is not that kind of story, and Bethany is not that kind of person. .
For a 13-14-year-old young girl, it does not require a complicated process to be strong and cheer up. It goes straight to the depths of Bethany's soul, and that's all her darkness. There is no more, more so-called "real" darkness and difficulties are yours, not hers, she is already the real her.
Speaking of which, we have a question, which was considered at the stage of adapting the script. Do we want a real Bethany, or do we want a real Bethany in the eyes of the critics? If she chooses the latter, a lot of darkness that does not belong to her will be imposed on her. What she thinks, says, and does will be like a fake girl in the heart of an adult.
Although I have no intention of making a youth movie, I don¡¯t want to make a fake Bethany story. So I choseFor example, after a shark attack and lost his left arm, the first thing he said when he woke up was "When will I be able to surf again?" He retrained a month later and returned to the sea competition two months later. There was pain, but more fun. There is strong real Bethany.
The growth of age does not mean that people have more courage, but it usually makes people lose courage.
"The more wisdom in life, the less courage", "Newborn bears are not afraid of wolves" and other proverbs also tell us this. This is exactly what happened to Bethany. Her courage comes from multiple sources. I dare say one of them is her youth.
??You who are old think that there should be more pain, more struggles, and more complicated changes in mentality. That will happen to an old person, not her! Why are you unwilling to put aside your prejudices and look at this 13-year-old girl? Haven't you seen her eyes full of innocent hope?
The so-called courage of youth is to not think too much and believe that all dreams can come true. Bethany believed what adults do not easily or even never believe, so she created a miracle instead of still wondering whether to continue surfing. But she also has the fickleness of a girl (so does a boy). She has been frustrated, cried, and thought about giving up. What she doesn¡¯t have is iron determination or a movie-like awakening of no more worries from now on. Even if she becomes As a surfing champion, she will still have the next setback and frustration.
"Soul Surfer" has presented the most authentic Bethenny. I don't understand how this can be false?
I don¡¯t even understand the reason for negative reviews like ¡°Why is it a drama film and not a documentary?¡± Why do biographical films exist? Why are you a film critic? Why am I writing this diary? I want to know why.
Having said that, I still know a little bit about what you want, a black coach, or an old man. The best thing is, an old black coach with white wool-like hair and beard who has served in Shawshank Prison. Then my movie has a political correctness shield, which is scarier than God.
But how many coach-player movies do we have? Good or bad, praised or scolded, adapted from reality or fiction?
"Pink" (1992), "On Ice" (1993), "Tea Boy" (1998), "Glory Days" (2000), "The Pitcher" (2002), "Coach Carter" (2005), "Reviving the Style" (2006, still in theaters), "We Are Marshall" (scheduled for December-22 this year)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? There are too many to count. I can only mention some representative ones. It seems that the world cannot function without coaches (sorry, my football coaches, I love you!), no, we still have Gucci. , if you don¡¯t like it, just go to Prada. Who doesn¡¯t like pandas?
It¡¯s one of the biggest clich¨¦s of Hollywood sports movies, as if the only legitimate person to educate the protagonist in such a film is the coach, and anyone else who does it is too smart, even the protagonist¡¯s parents. Come on, who wouldn¡¯t say a few words of ¡°everything¡¯s going to be okay¡±?
Everyone, everything is going to be fine!
"False, this matter will never get better." First of all, I have to say that I am also a film critic myself, and some friends who are familiar with me probably know that, no offense, I am going to start being rude, there are some fools in the film critic world! It has no other meaning than fools. But I also believe that they will praise me for my talent twice this year.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?but today¡¯s incident is not my first, it is just an imitation of David Merrick. Maybe some people don't know what's going on, let me tell you simply.
Legendary theater producer David Merck (1911-2000, "Hello, Dolly!" and other works has won a total of 9 Tony Awards, as well as 28 nominations, 2 honorary awards personally) in his new play in 1961 Before the performance of "subways-are-for-sleeping" (subways-are-for-sleeping), he selected the seven major New York theater critics Howard Taubman, Walter Cole, John Chapman, and John MacLean. , Richard Watts Jr., Norman Nadal and Robert Coleman will slam the musical, and then
Merrick found seven ordinary citizens with the same name and surname from the New York Yellow Pages, invited them to watch the internal performance of the new play and obtained the right to use their names, and then coaxed them to say something like "The greatest drama in the past thirty years." "Musical Comedy", "The Best Musical of All Time", "A Mythical Musical, I Love It" and other clich¨¦ reviews, and then placed a full-page advertisement in the New York Herald to list these seven theater reviewers People's positive reviews and names (in bold) are posted.
This musical with "rave reviews" ran for 205 performances, lasting almost six months. The audience was so happy to watch it that no one cared what another group of theater critics said.
Do you want to say that the audience has been misled? This may be the essence of how fame and comments affect the audience. When you have a mentality of pilgrimage and tolerance??When you look at a certain work, everything is good, and you can tolerate the bad ones or find reasons to make them good. You always see its goodness; when you look at it with suspicion and criticality, Then everything is bad, and you cannot tolerate even the slightest bit of badness. Good things can also become bad. You always see the badness of it.
This was the case in 1961, and it is still the case now. It is not just about how to read a work, but it happens when looking at any thing. Objectivity and subjective opinions rarely show their faces.
But it turns out that in this day and age, you can¡¯t deceive the world for six months. Paparazzi are everywhere.
¡°When it comes to David Merrick, people back then praised him for his wit, while others scolded him for false propaganda. Now, most people just say it¡¯s a good thing. Many things take time to judge. I put these words here. When people talk about the "Lou Rumnik Incident" 45 years later, they will only laugh and praise me as an interesting person. They may also say " Look, look, Ye Wei was willing to sacrifice his own reputation in order to warn the world, what a good person he was!"
Thanks! Seriously, this is so fun, hahaha.
Whatis there anything more fun? Irving Graberman steals the show again? Please see another article "It's Time to Review Film Critics" that was updated simultaneously. ¡¿