Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Historic -> Hearts of Iron: Man s Time Travel Story

Text Gandhi died in despair

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    Broken Indian Plate In 1953, a man died in India, his name was Gandhi.  Full name, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, respectfully known as Mahatma Gandhi, is the leader of the Indian national liberation movement and the leader of the Indian National Congress Party.  "Compared with the historical assassination by a crazy religious element after India's independence in 1948, in this dimension he was lucky enough to escape that assassination and finally died a "good death".  However, if he could choose his destiny, Gandhi would definitely choose the "real" history of his assassination, rather than the history that was changed beyond recognition by the time-travelers.  Because until Gandhi died on the hospital bed due to old age, he did not see the hope of Indian independence and self-government, but died with panic and melancholy about India's future destiny.  "I am very unwilling to accept that India has been divided, and it has been divided into many fragments." This was Gandhi's unwilling rant before his death.  He did not see India's independence from British rule, but he saw the division of India and the establishment of the "Khalistan State" dominated by Sikhs in Punjab and South Kashmir. This was his fight for independence for Indians over the years.  The ¡°maximum results¡± achieved.  Of course, Gandhi himself would rather die a hundred times than see this "result".  Until his death, Gandhi could not forget the scene when he visited New China in 1949 and met with the second leader of New China.  At that time, he thought that New China's attitude towards the Indian independence movement would change due to new people.  However, after Gandhi settled in Beijing, newspapers in this country began to popularize the history of "India since ancient times" as a "geographical term" to the public.  Although Gandhi was an Indian and could not read Chinese characters, some of his subordinates could understand. China's attitude on this matter can be imagined.  In the following years.  The British are under increasing international political pressure to "anti-colonialism", and the Soviets in northern India have also been irritating the British. They have been secretly encouraging people close to Kashmir and Punjab.  The Sikhs are fighting for independence.  China, on the other hand, also shouted the slogan: "New China supports the people of all ethnic groups in India to strive for independence."  The Soviets wanted to leave a relatively intact India for Gandhi to put pressure on China, but while China was clamoring to support the Indian independence movement, it also infiltrated private goods into it.  And the British saw that the situation in the Punjab was becoming increasingly unstable.  As the Sikhs in the colonial army became increasingly dishonest, they decisively carried out the "gecko tail docking" surgery in 1951, directly untying the Sikhs who made the most noise, and "generally and generously"  ¡± made them ¡°independent and self-governing¡±.  The Sikhs are the most combat-effective unit in the Indian army except the Gurkhas, who have the smallest number.  The number of Sikhs in the Indian colonial army was as high as 20%.  Once the Sikhs left, the Indian colonial army composed of the remaining Indians or Muslins was reduced to a fighting force.  The Sikhs established the "Kalistan State" and happily established their independent country. They were also very grateful to the British overlord for "loosing their ties". When the Sikhs established their country, the British deliberately moved some Hindus to dominate the country.  The territory was also allocated to the Sikhs.  Satisfy their "desire for independence".  Of course, this is unkind.  After releasing the Sikhs and alleviating the pressure within India, the British immediately changed their face and began to suppress other forces in India who wanted to pursue "Indian independence."  By 1951, the British maintained their control in India, mainly relying on the army, except for a small number of local troops.  Another important main force is the "pariah division" and "sudra division" composed of the so-called "honorary Bretonians".  These troops are composed of lower castes and untouchables.  They were extremely grateful to the British, and they found no market for the Indian independence ideas of Gandhi and his gang.  Gandhi even got wind of it, and the British even privately promised the new elite among these "honorable Bretons" that they would gradually hand over the ten southern Indian states to these untouchables over the next ten years.  He who is born governs.  ?That is to say.  The British were changing the 'class structure' of South India.  ??And the British are not talking in vain.  Beginning in 1944, the British conducted a "pilot" in West Bengal and implemented the "honorary Bretons" system. In addition to using an empty title to "remove their hats" for these low and low castes, they also established  Specialized schools.  Young children were recruited from these untouchables and lower castes to cultivate intellectuals.  At that time, the British spoke in a very high-profile and nice way.  "Knowledge changes destiny." "Honorable Bretons must have enough knowledge if they want to become truly upper-class people."  From 1944 to 1953, nine years were enough for the British to cultivate a generation of intellectuals among the "honorable Bhutanians", and then use them to replace the increasingly restless Indian "upper castes"  ".  There is a saying in China that if you move any of those chairs on the upper floors, you will die.  It is true that many people in the upper class of India are aware of the backwardness of the caste system and firmly demand its abolition. Even after 1950, it became a "recognized" truth among India's entire intellectual class.  However, the "romanticity", hypocrisy and reactionary nature of intellectuals, such as "petty bourgeois Bolshoi" elements, are precisely reflected in their "words" and "actions" and in the transformation  After hurting their interests, his position changed.  ¡°Screaming against the caste system can satisfy this class¡¯s sense of moral superiority.  However, when the caste system is abolished, and is "really" abolished, harming their interests, most of the people whose interests are harmed will often be like rats whose tails are burned.  Change your position immediately and jump to the other side.  Arturia, who inherited Lin Han¡¯s dark understanding of human beings, knew very well what the petty bourgeoisie of Indian intellectuals looked like. In fact, the petty bourgeoisie of all countries are the same in this regard.  So, the method she proposed was to conduct a "pilot" in India to "really" abolish the caste system.  The first to start the experiment is still West Bengal, which has the best foundation.  Here, in 1951, the British dismissed a large number of "high-caste Indian civil servants" who were "unfirm" and replaced them with "honorary Bretons" they had trained themselves.  The loss of their jobs and the unemployment crisis immediately silenced these young freshmen who opposed the caste system in India.  Many were standing in the street before.  Indians who waved the banner of "anti-caste system" immediately recognized their "class" attributes, and then learned to "stand on the basis of their own class interests" and speak "truthfully".  Through Artoria, the British also learned to play with the great weapon of "class struggle", cleverly concealing the class contradictions within the colonial countries and covering up the contradictions between the colonial countries and the mother country.  A large number of former untouchables and "honorary Bretons" from lower castes replaced "upper castes" in many important positions in India's official institutions, which immediately caused an explosion in the upper class of India.  The British did this very well when they responded to the accusations from China and the Soviet Union in the international arena.  Even more unceremoniously, he used the reaction of the upper castes in India to refute the Sino-Soviet theory: At that time, at the Eurasian Joint Council discussion on the Indian issue, the British representative arrogantly questioned the Chinese and Soviet theories: "British  What the empire is doing in India is a real revolution, breaking down the evil caste system that India has maintained for two thousand years. If the British Empire gives up on India now, who will continue this revolution with the loss of Gandhi?  Are anti-caste people turning into pro-caste bourgeois romantics just for the sake of their own interests? "This is the first time that people from the socialist camp have been pointed at by a capitalist spokesperson for talking about "revolutionary topics."  The Soviet representative at the time retorted angrily: "Of course it is not a Social Democratic-style opportunist like the Congress Party. It is a party that is truly rooted in the lower levels of India." The British representative nodded and agreed: "You mean the Communist Party of India?  ) Communist Party? If they can do what the Ratani guerrillas did, the British Empire really believes that they can truly abolish the caste system in India."  The United Kingdom, China and the Soviet Union were all quarreling with each other, but after the content of the quarrel reached India, it frightened the old upper echelons of India.  Those "honorable Bretons" from lower castes and untouchables, they just take their jobs and status, the Communist Party of India?  Does it mean the Communist Party of India, the group of Ratani guerrillas?  This group of people wants to steal everything from them including their lives.  Even if they work for the British for a hundred years, India's old upper class are not willing to see themselves fall into the hands of the "Ratani Gang".  Just by threatening to hand over India to the Communist Party of India.  As well as using the "honorary Bretons" to divide India's old upper class, the British stabilized their crumbling colonial rule in India.  Of course the unlucky Gandhi could see the sinister intentions of the British, but in the face of this situation, what good solution could he have.  The biggest difference between India and New China is the group of people who founded New China.  Many of them came from rich peasants, small landowners, and petty bourgeois, and their families were very good. However, in the revolutionary years, they all "betrayed" their own class, broke with their own class, and revolutionized their own lives first, and then revolutionized others.  Courage to live.  So it will be like this?In addition to the different historical backgrounds and cultural atmospheres of the two countries, another reason is that nearly a hundred years before the founding of the People's Republic of China, China had gone through endless struggles and struggles amid endless oppression.  The reason why Marxism-Leninism and socialism succeeded in China was that it was the "last" choice of countless ancestors after they tried all paths and failed.  A sapling can only grow into a towering tree if it is exposed to wind and sun, and is covered by ice and snow.  Before the Chinese revolution succeeded in the end, it had gone through countless painful and torturous tests and forged a group of elites with blood and fire.  Although Lin Han cheated in this plane and was much less calcined, before Lin Han appeared, it suffered countless times more than the so-called "elites" in India who are fighting for "Indian independence"  .  Lying on the hospital bed, taking his last breath bit by bit, Gandhi couldn't help but recall that he once visited China and met the legendary "Eastern God" Lin Han in China. Lin Han's love for him and his  evaluation of the Congress Party.  "The biggest failure and mistake of you and your Congress Party is the "non-violent non-cooperation" movement you launched." "Excellent cadres, determined revolutionaries, or indomitable Indian independence activists,  How is it cultivated? It¡¯s not about placing an advertisement in a newspaper, writing an article, or just talking about it. It¡¯s about going through the waves, going through fierce and cruel struggles, and using the enemy¡¯s butcher¡¯s knife as a filter.  The determined ones will be eliminated! The petty bourgeois romantics will be eliminated! Those with insufficient ability will be eliminated! Even those who are not "lucky" will be eliminated!  Elimination and elimination at the cost of countless revolutionaries' lives, has your Congress Party ever experienced this kind of elimination at the expense of countless revolutionaries' lives?  I can't stand the "pain" of the Retanians taking away your jobs, and leave India to an organization like yours to launch a revolution? Well, do you want to carry out a "reform" and expect you to crush the caste system in India?  It's better to believe in the British bayonet." At that time, Lin Han was so harsh and mean to hurt Gandhi.  At that time, Gandhi was almost eighty years old. As he was dying, he could not compare with Lin Han's sharp teeth and sharp tongue. Lin Han's harsh words shattered his life-long belief in "non-violence and non-cooperation". Gandhi's spirit  collapsed.  After losing this breath, Gandhi fell ill soon after returning to China. Lord Shiva had issued a summons to him.  Lin Han's unceremonious accusations against Gandhi at the time were criticized by the organization afterwards, and he was forced to conduct another review.  But when he thought that he could "knock down Gandhi with his tongue," he felt so happy. As for self-criticism, this guy's skin was already as thick as a city wall.  When I reviewed myself, I criticized myself as worthless, but I was determined not to change my mind. I was still thinking about finding an opportunity to catch this old guy Gandhi and damage him again.  As for his virtue, Li Runshizhu (crab) Xi has long been aware of it, but there is nothing he can do about it.  Gandhi finally died in despair in August 1953.  After his death, Nehru took over where Gandhi left off and continued to fight the British.  It was just that in the Indian National Congress at this time, internal party members were wavering on race issues for their own personal jobs and interests, causing great divisions. In order to unify the opinions of these people, Nehru spent a lot of time.  energy.  My WeChat public account is hal-rog Remember, it is a WeChat public account, not a WeChat ID. There is a minus sign "-" in the middle (to be continued)
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report