The agreement with Murdoch and John will have huge benefits for Li Mingbao to further expand his market share in the United States. *Basically, as long as Li Mingbao acts in accordance with the agreement, it means that he has two big backers at once, one is 20th Century Fox, and the other is News Corporation. Despite the fact that News Corporation is still a newcomer in the United States, their actual direct entry into the U.S. market is not as long as that of Li Mingbao. But their strength is not comparable to that of Li Mingbao. After all, European and American consortiums are basically not that kind of national consortiums. In other words, they are not like those consortiums in Japan. They are rooted in Japan and can invest wherever they want. They are not an international consortium anywhere. Their roots can only be in Japan. Without Japan, their influence will drop by at least half. It is said that capital has no national boundaries. Although this statement is good, it is not complete. After all, there is not only one capital model in this world, but there are countless types of subdivisions. In general, influential capital actually has There are only three kinds. ¡°A kind of capital is capital without national boundaries, and the representative of this was Rothschild at the beginning. At that time, they had capital without national boundaries. Their capital model was directly reflected in the market. No country could represent their interests. At most, it was just a left hand exchange for a right hand. And this kind of capital is also the mainstream capital in modern society. The other type of capital is representative of capital such as the Nippon Consortium. Although their capital is privately owned, their capital is backed by the state to a large extent. There is also South Korea's Samsung. Their roots are actually limited to a certain country. Although they have a lot of foreign investment and seem to be very international, this kind of internationalization essentially relies on the country, not the country. It depends on the strength of the consortium itself, so this type of capital usually has a deep relationship with their country. If the country does not support such capital, they will soon decline. Of course, under normal circumstances, the country would not do such a thing, because the relationship between their government and the consortium is too close, and if the consortium fails, it is definitely not a good thing for the government. Therefore, the most that can be done is to change the leader of the consortium, rather than attack the strength of the consortium. Of course, this type of capital actually has another extreme performance situation, represented by Morgan and Rockefeller in the United States. Speaking of them, they are actually not much different from Japan's Mitsui and South Korea's Samsung. The reason why many people regard them as capital without national borders is because their investment environment is much better than that of consortiums such as Mitsui Samsung. Who calls the United States a superpower? This includes local consortiums. In terms of actual investment, there is no difference at all from capital without national borders. But in fact, these consortiums are capital with national borders. Of course, their capital is more powerful than the country. The country is completely under the control of these capitals. Only a weird country like the United States can produce such capital. Whoever said that the United States was founded was based on How can a country be founded only through the alliance of capitalists? In fact, these consortium capitals in the United States are doing the work of the consortium and the country. The consortium is the country, and the country is the consortium. When they need to be a consortium, they are a consortium. When they need to be a country, they are the country. No matter how beneficial it is, they are completely different from other countries that have experienced complex evolutions. The last type of capital is public capital in the usual sense. Representatives are countries like the Soviet Union and China. Such countries do not have any capital at all, but their capital serves politics. In other words, such capital is a subordinate position at the political level. Doesn't take the initiative. These three types of capital are the mainstream capital in the world today. As for the smaller capitals, they all belong to these three types of capital. As for Murdoch's News Corporation, generally speaking, they are now a capital without borders. Although when they first developed, they were considered a capital with borders in Australia. Their main forces and industries are all in Australia. within the territory. "But when Murdoch began to vigorously develop News Corporation and invested more and more abroad, investment in Australia began to remain the same. Such capital was already borderless capital. Capital Without Borders has a welcoming attitude towards American consortiums. Because the more such capital is absorbed, the stronger the capital power of the United States will be, and it will be more convenient to collect taxes and so on, so they welcome such capital. Rupert Murdoch enters the U.S. market, along with Li Mingbao and Japanese consortiums. The reaction of the market and the United States is completely different. The reason why people in the United States do not welcome Japanese people to come to the United States does not mean that they are really disgusted with the skin color and the Japanese people¡¯s lavishness in buying things in the United States.??It doesn't mean that they really care that much about Japanese products occupying the American market, causing many American companies to close down. If they really care about the problem of business closures, the competition among their internal companies will be more important than the external competition. It's even more intense, so why don't they consider imposing restrictions? The most critical point is that Japanese companies are not international consortiums. They have national boundaries. Although the profits they earn in the United States also have to pay taxes to the United States, the money they earn is The bulk will not be placed in the domestic market of the United States, but will flow into Japan. This is basically equivalent to Japanese companies constantly bleeding the American market, instead of strengthening the domestic strength of the United States. Under such circumstances, the domestic consortium in the United States Including the government, it is natural to kill Japanese companies. You have already used a knife on me, why can't I use a gun on you? The pigs you raise eat better than their owners. If your blood is not drained, whose blood will be drained? Based on this principle, China in later generations also followed the same path as Japan. At the beginning, Americans didn't care much. After all, China was only producing the most basic products at that time and made money by selling labor force. The money is not as much as the money the United States makes from selling a set of slightly higher-grade industrial products. Therefore, at the beginning, the United States held a supportive attitude towards such trade. After all, they have long passed the age of making money from selling labor force. , entering a more advanced industrial product stage. ¡°But when China also starts selling similar products from the United States, the United States will no longer make money on its high-end industrial products, and low-level products will also be occupied by China. If the United States does not say no to China, then the United States will no longer be called a hegemonic country. But after all, China is not like Japan, which can cut off its flesh at will. After all, it is one of the five gangsters, so it cannot use the same method as Japan to deal with China. However, the United States does not only have such an economic method, so from other aspects On the other hand, we can also implement a flesh-cutting policy towards China, but it is a little more elegant, but it is essentially the same. Of course, what Li Mingbao needs to consider now is not these high-level economic issues. The problem he faces is actually the nature of capital. News Corporation is a capital without borders. The United States welcomes them to join, thereby increasing the strength of the United States. However, although Li Mingbao¡¯s capital is smaller than that of News Corporation, it stands to reason that the attention will not be that big, but the reality is that Li Mingbao The resistance encountered in the United States is completely different from the resistance encountered by News Corporation. If Li Mingbao encounters a difficult mode, then News Corporation is actually equivalent to a simple mode game. The most fundamental reason why there is such a big difference on this issue is that although Li Mingbao¡¯s capital is small, the nature of Li Mingbao¡¯s capital is not international capital, but local capital. His capital base is actually in Hong Kong. Not in America. Therefore, the money Li Mingbao earns in the United States is essentially the same as those in Japanese companies. For this reason, the treatment of Li Mingbao and News Corporation are completely different. This has nothing to do with the scale of capital. , simply because of the form of capital. Li Mingbao has made it clear that he is not preparing to continue to develop in the United States, but is preparing to treat American companies as cows. The capital in the United States will naturally exert more pressure, either to make Li Mingbao give up his capital model, or to directly let Li Mingbao Kill him and then embezzle Li Mingbao¡¯s assets in the United States. On such a principled issue, it is impossible for Li Mingbao to relent. Although the industry in the United States seems to be more promising than that in Hong Kong, with Li Mingbao's ability, he may not be able to make great achievements in the United States. But capital and strength are not simply reflected in funds. When funds reach Li Mingbao's current level, they are actually just a bunch of data. Even if he can earn 10 billion US dollars here in the United States, he will not be able to earn 10 billion US dollars here in the United States. The strength of Li Mingbao cannot be as powerful as those of the old consortiums. To put it simply, in the United States, Li Mingbao earns one billion U.S. dollars and earns 10 billion U.S. dollars. In terms of comprehensive strength, there is no essential difference. The difference is, after all, the total amount of capital in the United States is very large. Ten billion is an astronomical figure for ordinary people, but for the consortium, it is not that they cannot come up with this money. Even the Japanese can come up with something that the United States can produce. Is it possible that the consortium still can¡¯t be found? So money is actually data and does not represent strength. But if Li Mingbao puts this money in Hong Kong or the mainland, he can completely affect the economic structure there, and then sit in the position of rule maker. Such influence is incomparable. Just like in the political world, the strength of the head of a small African country may not be as strong as that of a county in China. If you put it in China, it is the level of a county party committee secretary. In China's internal official circles, the number of such people is absolutely Not too little, not a big deal at all. But if the head of this small country comes to China for a state visit, then the people who receive himPeople, at least at the level of the Central Committee, and ordinary provincial committees, do not have this qualification. Although in fact, the strength of this small country is at most equivalent to the strength of a county in the country, but rules are rules, not strength. To decide. When it comes to Li Mingbao, the rules are actually very simple. He has 10 billion US dollars in assets in the United States. If it is placed in the United States, it is the size of a small consortium and cannot affect the pattern. But if it is placed in Hong Kong, he can directly Talk to the Governor of Hong Kong, and your right to speak is definitely not small. This is the pattern, this is the treatment. Therefore, when Li Mingbao has small arms and legs, he will not put his foundation in the United States at all, because he has no sense of presence here and cannot get more benefits.