The man with a low IQ who holds power in the White House is in a state of distress right now. Because of his limited IQ, he prefers to use direct and simple methods to solve problems. Because of his direct and simple approach, the United States almost hastily negotiates with China. This world war started, but now the powerful US military force that Bush relies on for survival has been severely frustrated by China, and Bush has fallen into confusion.
When the war has reached this point, it is no longer possible for anyone to withdraw if they want to. Especially since the US military has lost a large number of military assets and soldiers and has started a real firefight. Even though some people already know that the war is not beneficial to both sides, they still only To be able to go to the dark side on the road where two tigers are bound to die if they fight each other.
In order to deal with the increasingly severe threat, George W. Bush urgently convened a high-level meeting to discuss the next plans of the United States.
"Everyone, the situation is not optimistic now. The defeat of two consecutive large-scale battles has made our people, including our allies, question our capabilities, especially our leadership. Our opponents have also increased their confidence in victory, and A more ambitious military plan is brewing, and we absolutely cannot allow it at this time. Now, I hope that everyone can work together to find a way to solve the current crisis." Bush set the tone of the meeting with a gloomy face.
Rumsfeld sighed: "The situation in South Africa has shown signs of collapse. The Chinese troops that landed are very powerful, and we cannot compare in terms of the size of the troops. South Africa has already experienced a serious swing. According to relevant intelligence, South Africa has already I plan to surrender to the Chinese when the time is right."
Deputy Defense Minister Wolfowitz frowned and said: "No wonder the South Africans' resistance is so weak. They did not mobilize the entire people as a national crisis like India did, but only fought against the Chinese to a limited extent. Once encountered When faced with difficulties, they ran faster than rabbits, leaving the arduous task to the NATO allies."
Cheney brought the topic back to how to deal with the Chinese before. He said: "I'm afraid that in South Africa we will have to withdraw in the end. We need to consider supporting India from other directions. The west is not feasible, and maybe the east is also A choice.¡±
Bush was not interested in this, "Eastern? Is it the direction of Australia? But the Republic of Nanyang is China's watchdog in the South China Sea, and it is also closer to China's mainland. China has deployed on Natuna Island As an aircraft carrier battle group, if we want to break through from here, it may not be easier than breaking through in South Africa."
Cheney said: "But starting from the east will give China a greater shock. We also have the Philippines and Japan. If we launch an attack on China on the entire Asia-Pacific front, China will inevitably mobilize the strength of the Indian Ocean Fleet to protect itself. After all, China's geopolitical environment is much worse than ours. They can be surrounded by their allies, but they are also surrounded by their enemies. As long as we can make good use of this environment, we can find a breakthrough point and achieve a strategic reversal. ¡±
Secretary of State Powell said: "Logically there is no problem with this idea, but it involves us going to full-scale war with the Chinese in the Asia-Pacific. It is opening up a brand new battlefield, and there are greater risks."
Rumsfeld said: "We have been planning for the Asia-Pacific battlefield before the war broke out, because this is our initial scenario for the outbreak of the war. However, the war did not proceed according to our plan. First, when our strength increased, The outbreak of the weak Indian Ocean has caused our main passivity. Although opening a new battlefield is a risky decision, the risk means reward. After we regain the initiative on the battlefield with greater confidence, the entire war pattern will change. Changes, although we are unwilling to admit that the level of the Chinese army may have surpassed our army in terms of combat effectiveness of military units, but war has never been a game of superior Si vs. superior Si, or lower Si Si vs. lower Si. Overall, our The strength is still beyond that of the Chinese, we just need to play smarter and more efficiently to take advantage of our advantages.¡±
Bush was very inspired after hearing this. He said: "In this way, the best choice for opening a new battlefield is actually not in the Asia-Pacific. Our military power in Europe and that of our NATO allies is far superior to that of several Eastern European countries in China. This can be used to Destroy the Chinese power in Europe in one fell swoop, thereby building up our confidence and showing the world that the Chinese are not invincible."
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Myers said: "It is true that the Chinese are less likely to be able to resist launching an offensive in Europe, but the war in Europe cannot help us rescue our Indian allies. The situation in India has deteriorated greatly now. The Chinese army There are absolutely no opponents in this land. The northwest states of Rajasthan and Gujrat have been completely occupied by the Chinese, and the Chinese have even begun to support some people to conquer these two states where ethnic minorities are the main body. After independence from India, according to this model, India may be divided into a group of small countries. With the Indian national character, if we are late, India may succumb to the power of the Chinese. "
Bush snorted: "A man with a billion people?? countries can't hold China back like Vietnam or North Korea. Bush claims to carry out all-people guerrilla warfare. How come I don't see the Chinese having a headache about this and losing a lot of soldiers and equipment? "
Rumsfeld explained: "Although there is no conclusive evidence, we have intelligence that the Chinese are implementing a scorched-earth policy in India. They are frantically purging India of any Indian soldiers or people associated with the resistance. All will be wiped out, and a large number of people will be imprisoned in prisoner-of-war camps. Another less exciting news shows that many Indian troops were brainwashed and induced by the Chinese to act as puppets for the Chinese. Army, and these puppet troops were obviously more diligent than the Chinese when suppressing their own residents. In addition, the rural Indian farmers were not interested in resisting. The Chinese's main targets were cities, and they did not do much damage to rural areas. In the absence of a government, Indian farmers no longer need to pay high taxes, which makes some Indian farmers happy to see the Chinese deal with urban residents."
Bush Jr. rubbed his temples and said: "What a chaotic scene this is. It seems that our allies will be mud that cannot be wiped off the wall."
He adjusted his breathing and thoughts, and said: "We have to mobilize in the Asia-Pacific and European battlefields to catch the Chinese by surprise. The Chinese's global military deployment is not as good as ours. The collapse of one or two battlefields may give China a People cause huge trouble."
No one at the table objected to George W. Bush's crazy move. Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld and others were all hawks and full-fledged militants. Although launching offensives in Europe and the Asia-Pacific at the same time might be extremely risky, and It takes a lot of energy, but they all think this is a good way to break the deadlock.
Rumsfeld said: "If we can defeat the Chinese in Eastern Europe, we can secure the entire Mediterranean, and thus we can gain an advantage on the battlefield in the Middle East. The Turks can no longer tolerate the arrogance of the Kurds. They have always been interested in pulling in We will completely defeat the Kurds, and we also need oil from the Middle East. Egypt has shown a clear attitude towards the SCO, which we cannot tolerate. If we defeat Egypt and seize the Suez Canal, we will be able to attack China's East African military bases. Through this window, we can once again enter the Indian Ocean and provide support to India.¡±
Miles added: "The battle in the Asia-Pacific may be more difficult. I propose that Japan and the Philippines should focus on containing the Chinese, and our main breakthrough point should be Australia. When Nanyang became independent, it offended a series of countries such as Indonesia. If we can win them over to our side at this time, coupled with the strength of Australia and us, we will be able to form a relative advantage in this area. We do not seek to completely defeat the Chinese, but only need to establish a channel here and enter the Indian Ocean. By then, China¡¯s Indian Ocean Fleet will have to detach its forces from Madagascar to the East Indian Ocean. With this kind of mobilization, we will be able to find more loopholes and flaws of the Chinese and defeat them.¡±
Bush finally showed some red light. He clapped his hands and said: "Very good. Live a little and live the whole situation. As long as we can gain an advantage in one battlefield and expand it, we can turn the advantage into a victory and let China God bless America.¡±
Under the guidance of such strategic thinking, the United States began to make every effort to divert its energy from South Africa and look for better opportunities from other corners of the chessboard. In the European battlefield, the Americans very "magnanimously" handed over the leadership to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, while the US military was on the second line. The natural goal was to defeat countries such as Romania and Yugoslavia, as well as the Chinese troops stationed there. Among them, Germany and France intend to take up the banner of the European land war, and the United States is also happy to see this healthy competition. After all, the European battlefield does not look like it can be defeated.
In the Asia-Pacific battlefield, the US military mobilizes its own aircraft carrier battle group, hoping to avoid defeats like the Mozambique Strait and Madagascar. Of course, in Australia, the US military can also mobilize more powerful shore-based aviation to support the fleet. The US military only needs to defend one line. passage, rather than completely driving away the Chinese, so the tactical difficulty is not particularly great.
At the same time, George W. Bush has successively approved a number of very radical weapons plans. China's Century bombers, 096 nuclear attack submarines and other weapons have caused Americans to suffer a lot. Americans need better weapons to fight this war.