Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Romance -> Rebirth of Entertainment Storm

Volume One: Set Sail Chapter 926 Movie Review (You don¡¯t need to subscribe)

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    I have to say that the box office of "Iron Man" is indeed rising crazily, but as the American Music Festival is approaching, the other two movies are also promoting like crazy. They also want to make the box office get another hit.  A surge in one aspect.  The movie "The Hobbit" originally received approval from others at the box office, and its box office performance was actually not too weak compared to Iron Man. Therefore, at this time, "The Hobbit 1" can be said to have been praised by countless  people appreciate it.  On the other hand, the movie "The Hobbit 1" was highly praised by the famous film critic Clarient.  This is what he said about the movie - "Why I say this movie is better than The Lord of the Rings" "As if I couldn't wait to prove to the whole theater that I was the most geeky one, I skipped work on the day of the release to watch it.  The Hobbit.  After I came back, the British basically asked me the following three questions: How was it?  Are you looking at 2D or 3D?  Which one is better than The Lord of the Rings?  The answer to the first question: Great.  This movie carries so much, and I think the best thing about it is that it embodies human imagination to an unprecedented level.  The CG of Dale, Erebor and Sun Vendell have been superb, especially when Sun Vendell flashed out of the valley, surrounding the waterfall pouring on the cliff and sparkling in the setting sun. I think that scene made Tolkien  I cried in tears.  The answer to the second question, if you have the conditions, please look at 3dimaxhfr, but if it is an ordinary screen, I think 3D is of little significance.  As for the third question.  My answer is.  I think it surpasses The Lord of the Rings.  There are many factors.  First, consider your own issues.  When the Lord of the Rings came out, I was just a little kid with poor aesthetics. My love for Middle-earth was even lower than it is now. I was at a stage where I knew almost nothing about British culture. I had a little homework when watching the first two books.  Didn't do anything.  Before watching Hobbit this time, I discussed it with the British in the office for nearly two months. This is also the second possible factor, which is that I watched Hobbit in the UK.  Tolkien may be just a pastime for China.  It is a foreign literature, but in Britain it is part of the culture and has penetrated into everyone's blood.  The person you think is least likely to read fantasy literature can actually talk to you about Middle-earth.  And I think the most important reason, and the reason why I initially despised The Hobbit, is that it cut a small book into three movies.  Once again, I want to review my preconceptions. Although I don¡¯t know how much I have suffered on this point, I admit that I am the only one who said, "Lord of the Rings is written one by one. Children's literature like The Hobbit was actually cut into  For the third movie, PJ is a fool who is colluding with Warner to defraud money."  A lot of people had the same idea as me at first.  And this idea is more or less based on a basic idea: the original Lord of the Rings is already very good, and it can't be filmed just like that. PJ must have ulterior motives for making other things, and no matter what, the Hobbit movie is impossible.  Better than this biography.  And reality slapped me hard in the face.  Cutting a book into three gives the opportunity for every little detail in the Hobbit book to be represented.  Some details don't even come from The Hobbit. For example, the part where Balin explains to everyone the origin of Thorin Oakenshield's name actually comes from Rotk, but I'm satisfied with this insertion. Some people may say it's cheesey, and it's deliberately sensational. What's the matter?  I like.  And the pleasure brought by this grasp of every small detail reminded me of the shortcomings of the original biography of The Lord of the Rings, and awakened those things that I was dissatisfied with in the original biography at the time.  For example, I told Fufu that eowyn was completely described as a fangirl in Rotk's movie.  Due to space limitations, there is too little foreshadowing.  One second he was still fighting against the Human Emperor, but the next second he saw the Prime Minister on the wall of Gondor and immediately climbed up.  The result of omitting or even missing a large part of Fara's and Eowyn's previous life experiences and psychological activities is that even if the heartfelt exchange of words on the wall is fully expressed, it is just like the confession downstairs in the university dormitory, artificial and artificial.  unexpected.  Of course, this is just an example, and it makes no sense to compare Hobbit with this book.  Compared with the grandeur of the original story, the overall layout of Hobbit is much smaller, which means that compared to the focus on the main line of the original story, the focus on details is more suitable for Hobbit.  This shooting method also leaves many challenges for PJ. The one I care about the most is the Battle of the Five Armies. Compared with Minas Tirith and Helm's Deep, it is more like a gang fight.  I'm looking forward to how to achieve sensory impact without exaggerating the original.  The first part of The Hobbit at least gave me the confidence to look forward to it.  "Because of Coriant's character, this film review subsequently received support from countless people. "A new journey, but full of memories.  The calm and prosperous Charles has a Chaoye version of the talkative Bilbo; the beautifulIn the Valley, Elrond and the Queen still don't eat the fireworks of the world (they only eat vegetable salads); Dry Tofu still likes to dazzle people with large light bulbs of several thousand watts, and Gulu is still hateful and pitiful.  Crossing the cliff and encountering the stone formation is like a replica of the Snowy Mountains, and the imax48 frame doubles Oakes' nausea.  For fans who are stupid, I will follow even if they make another 30 movies!  " "The movie does not start with all the familiar characters appearing, but takes turns appearing like old friends. Until Gollum appears, all the memories flow out and collapse Although it feels too similar to "The Lord of the Rings",  The excitement of the last hour is enough to rekindle passion for the previous game.  A new chapter, starting again, "all encounters in the world are indeed reunions after a long separation."  "    "Really good.  I feel that although the plot is not as broad as The Lord of the Rings, splitting a book into three movies gives PJ the best opportunity to restore every detail in the original work, and every detail carries too much  emotion.  I burst into tears as soon as the opening theme song played, and every tearful moment after that.  Privateer, Song of the Lonely Mountain, Sunvendell, Galadriel's Glorious Turn.  And the Wind King"  "I have to say that the powerful navy plays a huge role at this time. In their view, as long as the publicity of "The Hobbit 1" is maximized, then other aspects will  It can be ignored. But one thing that the Americans who have always been unfavorable in the past is that this time there is not only "The Hobbit" in theaters. It can be said that "Minority Report" and "Minority Report" are in theaters.  The two movies of "Iron Man 2" also gave "The Hobbit 1" a higher level of change. Many people even felt angry about the mercenary trolls in "The Hobbit"! "It's too ugly!! The Ring.  Wang, I think it¡¯s boring to just walk all the way. Let¡¯s keep walking and walking. People gathered together and asked your mother to sing and blow smoke rings to shoot the mv The Elf Queen also stood on a rotating tray and spun around in circles. I sprayed soda and thought it was 60 years.  Were the former magicians more powerful? They were just assholes and were saved by eagles in the end. Why not throw the orc into the valley by the way? And there was an eagle who rode a damn horse up a damn mountain and flew straight away" "169 minutes  , there is no convincing plot in the whole film, and it inevitably seems a bit lengthy.  There is too much self-explanation, and there is not enough preparation for the grand world view.  In addition, it was a long time ago, so my impressions of the first three parts have become blurry.  " "Minus 250.  fed up.  It was really boring, so I watched the same movie in two halls to compare the difference between the so-called 48 frames and the normal picture.  The difference is that 48 frames is more like watching the opening animation of an online game like watching a TV series on a large computer screen.  " "It's smelly, long, and really ugly.  Maybe I'm really too old to appreciate this type of movie.  The dwarves were ugly enough when they appeared, but when the monsters came out later, I suddenly felt that the dwarves had become handsome guys.  Is the director deliberately disgusting the audience?  When that monster with the tumor on his chin appeared, I really wanted to vomit.  The 3D glasses hung on the bridge of my nose for nearly three hours, and my nose felt like it was collapsed.  Also, English is truly the lingua franca of the world. As far away as Middle-earth, it is popular to speak English.  "  I have to say, no matter in any era. In short, the audience is very discerning, and it is precisely because of this that many people have no other reaction to the promotion of "The Hobbit 1".  In their opinion, this movie is simply rubbish, and a rubbish movie is not worth watching. Amidst all this publicity, the box office of "Iron Man 2" has gone up and down, and many people are disappointed with "Iron Man".  He was also giving crazy praise. "1. On the recent global premiere of "Iron Man 2", as a die-hard fan who admires Iron Man very much, I decisively bought the first show ticket.  As a result, this movie became my exclusive myth.  I also deeply realized the benefits of watching movies alone.  There is no need to spend time explaining the ins and outs to fans of artifacts, and you can freely enjoy the exciting points without worrying about being looked down upon by those around you.  The most important thing is that you can communicate with the screening room at will. For example, if the picture is blurred, the sound effect is weak, don't rush to turn on the lights and leave after the subtitles are finished, there are easter eggs, etc.  2. The overall plot of "Iron Man 2" adopts a multi-clue structure. It needs to explain Iron Man's whiplash, Stark Industries, Congress and the military, and Tony Stark's search for new energy to sustain his life in just two hours.  The predecessor of the Avengers organization, the turmoil of Stark Industries after Pepper Potts was promoted to CEO, and many other themes are a bit difficult.  The result of this is that the entire film has a large capacity, but the focus is not clear enough.  This reminds me of the movie "Spider-Man 3" that tried to break through from multiple angles but was wildly criticized by fans.  3. One of the highlights of the film is the briefcase, which is called "ca-colored" in the film. It is not until the critical moment that its true function is revealed - a portable version of the Iron Man armor (appeared in this trailer)  .  Fans shouted accordingly that Iron Man is becoming more and more popularMore like Transformers.  4. Big praise for Scarlett Johansson's new role - Black Widow (a female agent of S.H.E.I.L.D.)!  In addition to Scarlett's own unique temperament and beauty, the look of the Black Widow created by costume designer maryzophers is also quite exquisite, better than the original comic book. 5. The most blatant product placement in "Iron Man 2" is this shot.  : Stark is lying leisurely on his side on a giant advertising prop for a certain brand of bagels and eating.  The setting up of this plot is just to amuse you, so I'll bear with it for now.  6. In terms of guest appearances, Iron Man¡¯s guest appearances are very powerful, whether he comes to play a supporting role (he has been active in the third season of "Spider-Man", "Fantastic Four", and "The Big Bang Theory" many times before)  trespassing).  Stevenwong said that in this scene of the opening of the Stark Industry Expo, he saw the CEO of Oracle.  I really don¡¯t know this person, but I did hear about oracle.  7. About Stark Industries¡¯ competitor Hammer Industries.  The name Hammer comes from the literal English translation of hammer.  Why use hammer?  I am not responsible for the gossip. In Marvel Comics' 2009 short story collection "Dark Reign", Iron Man was removed from the S.H.I.E.L.D. organization due to his role in the "Secret Invasion" incident.  Suspension.  Spider-Man's enemy, the Green Goblin, stole Iron Man's armor, built his own suit of steel, called himself "Iron Captain America", and reorganized S.H.E.I.L.D. into "Sky Hammer".  This Heavenly Hammer is called h.a.m.m.e.r.  So there are three possibilities: 1) The screenwriter will pave the way for future Avengers movies. This Hammer is likely to make a comeback and become a sponsor of the Skyhammer organization.  2) The screenwriter felt that the end of 2012 was approaching and the Avengers movie would not be filmed in Dark Reign, so he borrowed the name Skyhammer.  3) I feel so bad thinking too much.  8. Pay attention to the thing placed on the table in this scene (the film even gives a certain amount of space, Stark calls it a "Ferris wheel").  I have read in a book that this seems to be a perpetual motion model, invented by the Indian philosopher Bhaskara in 1150. The principle is to use the imbalance of the weight when the wheel rotates to make it keep moving.  Return to original position.  9. In the scene where Stark was modifying the hardware system to create new elements, he once took a disc-shaped object and placed it under the laser transmitter.  SHIELD officials were extremely surprised and said, "You don't know what this means."  What does this broken disc-shaped object with a five-pointed star in the middle mean?  That is Captain America¡¯s most iconic buckler!  (Still paving the way for next year's "Captain America" ??and 2012's "Avengers") 10. Regarding the easter eggs after the subtitles of the film.  After the subtitles went up in the cinema, I sat there for a full six minutes, waiting for the Easter egg after the subtitles, which even made the projection staff and the clearing staff very dissatisfied.  Unexpectedly, there is no more content after the subtitles. The theater manager explained that this was already the case when the film copy was obtained from China Film Group.  This fully shows that China Film Group has not done enough homework.  ¡­¡­¡­ Another aspect caused by the craziness of ¡°Iron Man¡± is that the Grammy Music Festival has been postponed.  (To be continued, please search Piaotian Literature. The novels will be better and updated faster!
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report