Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Romance -> Rebirth to change the world

Chapter 2565 Another choice of path

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    Chapter 2565 The Choice of Another Path The year 2005 was a particularly meaningful year for Chen Kangjie. In this year, he completely graduated from college, and his graduation was almost unknown to the outside world.  From entering the school in 1997 to graduating in 2005, Chen Kangjie completed his undergraduate studies at Industrial and Business University, and also received two master's degrees and two doctoral degrees.  Chen Kangjie did not get his doctorate through connections. Even if he could do so based on his contribution and influence, he did not.  He completed a truly important thesis, and his thesis ideas were groundbreaking.  For example, his doctoral thesis in political science was about "Another Choice of Political Path."  In his paper, he first described in detail the Western political system and their current promotion and promotion around the world. At the same time, Chen Kangjie also responded to a fallacy in Francis Fukuyama's "The End of History".  Francis Fukuyama believes that the capitalist system is the end point of social development around the world. In other words, there is only one political choice for the world, which is to embrace Western liberal democracy and capitalism.  ¡°And Chen Kangjie completely opened up a new point of view in his paper, that is, the world should have at least one choice, or even multiple choices. ? And Chen Kangjie also introduced philosophical perspectives in the paper.  It¡¯s a matter of whether there are options and how to choose.  ¡°There are no options, options and the only option are not in line with the dialectical thinking of philosophy, and the West is precisely trying to create an atmosphere where there is only one option in the world.  The most favorable evidence that many people have come up with for this is the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fact that the richest and most civilized countries in the world have their own system of values ??and ideologies.  However, Chen Kangjie feels that such arguments are weak and even wrong.  We cannot deny future changes and possibilities just because of today's reality.  Just because Bill Gates is the richest man in the world, we cannot think that he will always be the richest man. Just because the richest man was born in the software industry, we cannot think that the people who will replace him in the future can only be born in the software industry.  This logic doesn't work.  ¡°Moreover, Chen Kangjie reasoned that when the United States was founded, China was still the strongest country in the world, so why didn¡¯t the United States choose the feudal system at that time?  Even if the United States succeeds the United Kingdom, why doesn't it adopt a constitutional monarchy?  Why would he create a new system moderately?  Chen Kangjie also has another argument, that is, the vast majority of countries in the world adopt Western-style democracies and follow the capitalist road. However, South America, Southeast Asia, and even Central Asia after the disintegration have not achieved the same results as they did in Europe and the United States.  What is the level of prosperity? ? Then we have to analyze it from the perspectives of culture, religion, history, geopolitics, etc.  Chen Kangjie himself also provided other strong evidence to support his argument, that is, from Europe to Japan, including the United States, their economic growth is becoming increasingly weak, while the economic growth of emerging countries such as China is getting faster and faster.  There are many reasons that affect economic growth, but Chen Kangjie explained the political reasons for the weak economy in Europe and the United States from another perspective.  This is what they call a democratic system that they strongly promote.  In electoral competition, no matter who is on stage, the opposition parties below will oppose him for the sake of opposition.  The biggest appeal of the opposition parties is opposition. Only through opposition can they demonstrate their own value and the meaning of their existence.  This kind of opposition to competition that gradually loses its rationality reduces efficiency to a certain extent. To a certain extent, it confuses the rational judgment of the people just like centralized countries. Although the methods are different, the results are similar, and they reach the same goal through different methods.  The policy proposed by the political party in power may be correct and of strategic significance, but the opposition party will still oppose it and can always find reasons to oppose it, which will bring trouble to society.  Moreover, this democratic system will gradually produce a huge drawback, that is, society will be torn into different groups, because each political party will have its own group of supporters, and a disunited country or society will  In fact, it will cause harm to development. Even if the harm is not obvious, it affects all aspects of society in a subtle way.  ¡° Moreover, Chen Kangjie also made an assertion that elections rely on emotion rather than rationality. For the purpose of elections, the topics created by candidates are all emotional topics that can enhance the passion of voters.  Even some weird people will be elected in this way. The view that the democratic system can have a self-correcting function also has great flaws and room for discussion.  For example, Hitler was elected through a democratic system. The election slogans and electoral policies created by Hitler were actually not rational and did not conform to the fundamental interests of the German people. However, he was able to mobilize the passion of the people through populism.  Let everyone follow him??A point of no return.  ¡°One thing Chen Kangjie did not say is that he once went to Australia to help Lawrence¡¯s election campaign, and he once went to California to help Schwarzenegger¡¯s election campaign.  Is it rational for those voters to be influenced by Chen Kangjie?  Not at all.  Chen Kangjie is not an Australian or a Californian, and he did not provide an objective explanation and analysis of the electoral politics of the two candidates.  But those voters were influenced by him, because they liked Chen Kangjie, and this liking made them feel that Chen Kangjie's suggestion was right.  To a certain extent, this is ridiculous.  Chen Kangjie even made an assumption that if the media is bought and continues to release false news and operations, a very good leader may be destroyed by the election.  And this language, a few years later, was actually verified in the United States.  Chen Kangjie also analyzed a core value of democracy respected in the West - voting.  In order to give this approach a noble value, they also invented a word called "people's self-determination", which led to the concept of referendum.  Chen Kangjie analyzed that there is a contradiction between the two.  Democracy itself hopes to elect elites who are more capable than themselves through voting to manage the country, serve society, promote economic development, and propose policies and regulations that are beneficial to society.  A premise here is that the vast majority of ordinary people cannot be management experts and strategic masters. It is impossible for every ordinary person to be a political elite, so they choose people more suitable than themselves by voting.  But the referendum goes against this democratic logic.  A politician will bring up some issues for a referendum, such as whether to raise taxes, whether a region should break away and establish a separate country, and even whether to oppose immigration will become a referendum issue.  So here¡¯s the problem, if the selected elites can¡¯t make up their minds and don¡¯t know which option is better, how can ordinary people know?  Then ordinary people can only make choices through their own perceptual knowledge, and that choice will most likely be wrong.  "It's ridiculous. The people elected you, but you throw the problem back to the people. Then I really don't know what the point of electing you is."  And there will be more and more such examples in the future.  Combining these factors, Chen Kangjie wants to make one point, that is, the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics is correct and is one of the options that can be brought to all mankind.  Only with alternative answers can people decide which one is better from the comparison. Even after comparison, they feel that both still have flaws, and thus create another social system.  Chen Kangjie does not endorse or brag about our social system just because he is a party member. He actually really thinks so. This is the result of his reflection after traveling to many countries around the world and learning a lot of theoretical knowledge.  Chen Kangjie made a summary and refinement of the country's development in the past two decades. He felt that we are creating another standard, but we do not intend to promote such a standard because the characteristics of each country are different.  It is up to others to decide how to choose.  Of course, Chen Kangjie also answered that one of the reasons why many democratic countries in South America or Africa are not rich and powerful is that they were misled in the process of imposing social systems.  Westerners often recommend democracy and the rule of law to the world, which means developing democracy first and then building the rule of law.  However, Chen Kangjie believes that a society without the rule of law cannot develop true democracy.  Europe, the United States, and especially Japan are precisely following the path of rule of law first and democracy second.  For example, Japan¡¯s Meiji Restoration. How much democracy was there in Japan at that time?  No, but through the establishment of the rule of law, they have become a powerful country in Asia and even the world.  Therefore, in Chen Kangjie¡¯s view, the rule of law is more important than democracy, so he suggested that what we want to build is a country based on the rule of law, not a country based on democracy and the rule of law.  Don¡¯t forget, in addition to receiving a doctorate in political science, Chen Kangjie is also a doctor in law. It is not surprising that he combines these two majors to do research.  Only by finding your own democratic path step by step within the framework of the rule of law, that may be the one that suits you and the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics.  As long as we move forward along this path, we can find a different choice and path, and thereby contribute our special wisdom to the world.  Chen Kangjie¡¯s paper did not have much impact on the common people, but it had a great impact on the country¡¯s top leaders.  Many big names carefully study and analyze his thoughts and opinions.  Because this paper can not only find a reasonable understanding of our current situation from another angle.??, and more importantly, he also made groundbreaking designs for our future development path to a certain extent.  And for a long time to come, this paper indeed affected our reform direction.  Chen Kangjie¡¯s paper was not published under his real name, and he only published it in a university journal.  Many years later, many people knew that Chen Kangjie had already made a reasonable analysis of national development, and that after China's rejuvenation in its own special way, it indeed provided some countries with another political path to learn and choose.
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report