-
Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading
Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Historic -> smart factory Text Chapter 1,374 Biological Gnosis
Previous page Return to Catalog Next page
- Chapter 1,374 Biological Gnosis
Anthropologist Charles Oxnard and other scientists have painted a completely different picture of human evolution, pointing out facts that universities and museums have ignored. ¡¾¡¿
Oxnard believes that the genus Homo arose in a much older time period than standard evolutionary theory suggests, leading everyone to question the foundation of evolutionary theory.
As reported in "The Forbidden Zone in Archeology" edited by Kramer and Thompson, Oxnard pointed out: "The traditional concept of human evolution has become seriously ossified, and we must begin to explore ideas."
The most serious attack by opponents of the theory of evolution is that it cannot explain the origin of species and characteristics. The theory of evolution speculates that countless aspects of biological life are produced by random natural selection, even down to the pores on human skin, the legs of certain beetles, and the protective pads on the knees of camels.
But the inner purpose of the universe obviously does not conform to the explanation of evolution. For Darwinists, life can only exist under the premise of absolute materialism: everything that happens in the universe is just a series of accidental events and chemical reactions.
Even common sense has to take a back seat to scientific dogma.
We can take the human brain as an example. Dogma like "survival of the fittest" cannot explain its higher functions, such as the ability to calculate calculus, play the violin, or even consciousness itself.
Creationists¡¯ arguments are derived directly from orthodox religious teachings, and they reject metaphorical or allegorical interpretations of the Bible. This is a belief system that many Christians cannot truly accept, and not even supported by the Bible itself
At the same time, it also lacks scientific support. You must know that the fossil record shows that humans have existed on earth as long as 6,000 years ago. Furthermore, in a literal sense only, there are six days of creation. The time is also inconsistent with the time when the universe was created.
Nowadays, the common-sense concept of creation is increasingly accepted, and even some scientists find it difficult to deny the existence of internal intelligence in the universe.
But the problem for creationists is not the idea of ??intelligent design, but the dogmatism and literal application of the Bible that it embodies in the debate over human origins.
Evidence of ancient human origins has led many to consider extraterrestrial causes, although some vehemently oppose this line of thinking. But for others, the formal debate between creationism and evolution has always been lacking in flavor.
The once scorned catastrophe advocates now still have many stubborn opponents, and their ideas have only recently gained some recognition in the scientific community. Catastrophism insists. The continuous evolution of life on Earth was suddenly disrupted, changing the course of evolution.
To be precise, this fact obviously cannot be ignored: various types of disasters have occurred on the earth and in the universe. There is a well-known theory of catastrophism. The extinction of the dinosaurs was caused by a huge meteor hitting the earth, which produced energy equivalent to thousands of hydrogen atoms.
Other catastrophic theories study drastic changes in climate, earthquakes and even the exchange of Earth's magnetic poles.
Some scholars boldly assume that in prehistoric times, about 9500 BC. This is the time when Plato said Atlantis sank. An extremely terrible disaster swept the earth.
This disaster is the result of a distant cosmic explosion, which has left a profound and painful memory for mankind. After the explosion, volcanoes erupted on the earth, earthquakes continued, floods overflowed, mountains around the world rose, the earth's axis tilted, and the earth's crust shifted.
Some continents rise. Some continents sank.
Immediately afterwards, a large number of plants and animals became extinct. The terrifying global dark age has arrived. According to researchers' reports, the disaster struck suddenly.
The surviving people sought refuge in caves and mountains everywhere, and records of their plight are preserved in hundreds of flood myths or fire myths. These stories are found in every civilization and tradition, whether their skin is dark, white or white. The yellow ones all have similar flood myths.
In the last century, scientists have collected evidence about this disaster, but have half-heartedly explained part of it with the "ice age theory."
In fact, the basic errors in the ice age theory are now well known. And until now, science has been unable to explain the rest of the evidence.
About 180 years ago, with the completion of the study of the Alps, the Ice Age theory was born. Geology was just emerging at that time, and pioneers of that era identified most of the fossils in the mountains as the result of the Great Flood. This result is considered a benchmark for world history before the birth of modern science.
Many classic works promote this theory, and are convinced that our human world is only4000 to 6000 years old.
Despite this, as a systematic scientific system, geology has discovered that the history of the earth has been millions of years, and floods caused by heavy rain cannot explain the large number of species extinctions and geological destruction in that era.
In short, when the scientific community tends to adopt the dogma of uniformitarianism, it tries its best to explain everything in prehistory within the scope of pure materialism and denies all superstitious arguments or catastrophism.
In fact, scientists of that era denied the existence of the Great Flood and looked at the origins of mankind and past civilizations through colored glasses. This attitude still dominates the scientific community today.
Regarding this, Wanquan can go to the library or public education institution to check relevant information or even ask the professor to confirm.
The scientific community has latched onto the idea of ??ice age climate change, attributing compelling evidence of some prehistoric catastrophes to glacial movements. But for this theory to be established, it would require a rather terrifying ice age.
This period is longer than any period the earth has experienced before, and the living environment is much harsher.
"This can explain the endless evidence that seems to point to something that had an extremely violent collision with the earth, destroying most of the earth's mammals and causing the mountains to rise. Volcanoes erupted everywhere.
The disaster also split valleys and straits, spreading vast amounts of ore and gravel across the globe.
On this issue, rather than listening to traditional explanations and reluctantly explaining it randomly. It is better to listen to scientific records and speak for yourself. For this purpose, someone specifically interviewed J.B. Dreyer. He has been studying the field of prehistory for a long time and co-authored "The Catastrophe!" Ironclad evidence of a cosmic catastrophe in 9500 B.C."
Dreier told everyone that in his professional field, as a researcher, he has seen many "very strange anomalies", such as the unconventional discovery of a large number of prehistoric animal fossils in the bones, such as saber-toothed tigers, lions, Wolves, bison, rhinos, mammoths. The remains of these animals are found deep underground.
You know, these animals were extinct all over the world in prehistoric times. There are many such examples. He also found that humans appeared in similar environments, as determined by radiocarbon dating. These humans lived at the same time as those prehistoric animals.
They come from different races, including Europeans, Eskimos, and Melanesians.
The same situation occurs in India, Brazil, North America and the Balkans. Geologists also found hundreds of human remains in the cave, all of which died of natural causes.
¡°Obviously, these humans came to the cave shelter to avoid some kind of catastrophe.
¡°As a result, I became dissatisfied with some of the traditional interpretations,¡± Dreyer said. "The first thing I doubt is the ice age theory, and the other is the chronology."
In fact, finding the key to explaining these anomalies is no easy task. Fortunately, Dreyer was not alone on this issue. He received a call from Dr. D.S. Allen.
Allen is a biologist who studies continental drift. He and Dreyer were like-minded and eventually became partners. Their talents complement each other, and their respective fields of research complement each other.
For several years, the two men worked hard. Finally, a link to a global catastrophe was discovered that revealed the secrets of prehistory.
What Allen and Dreyer found is the opposite of what conventional science tells us. In the prehistoric era of the earth, there were sudden major events, such as continental drift, just like their British Isles, which separated from the European continent only 6,000 years ago.
As a doctor of philosophy from Cambridge University, Allen has profound attainments in physics, chemistry and biology. He has discovered that many of the same types of plants and animals exist in different parts of the world, a phenomenon that should not occur.
Because these plants and animals live in places separated by deserts or seas, Dreier believes that the unusual fossil evidence he found and the unusual biological phenomena discovered by Allen are just "two sides of the same riddle." component".
After several years of painstaking research, the answer to the riddle has been pieced together. When the mystery is completely revealed, Allen and Dreyer beautifully prove a scientific record that was once ignored, which adds a perfect touch to the mystery.
When other scholars asked Dreier what the significance of his work was, he responded: "It's like a splash of water in a frying pan, especially for evolution. Evolution is no longer just a matter of survival of the fittest." .You can encounter sudden disasters where the best and worst of everything are destroyed. In these cases, only the luckiest survive."
By using carbon-14 dating, Dreyer and Allen established a timeline for the unusual fossils and then used that to develop a timeline of events that caused the sudden extinction.
"The main thing is to date these fossils," Dryer explains. "They are very young geologically, even though they are very old in human history. These fossils mean that there was a huge change." Because the whole fauna and flora were in disarray for thousands of miles, and there were extraordinary deaths all over the place. You could see marine life dying with birds and land animals, lumps of coal mixed with tropical sea urchins, all these things It¡¯s all very interesting.¡±
¡°The ice age is just an invented term,¡± Dreyer said bluntly.
In a sense, the Ice Age is just a reaction of early geologists and the scientific movement, which constitutes the entire mature superstitious system of the Great Flood legend.
The original theory was that ice ages date back millions of years, with cycles of waxing and waning in the northern and southern hemispheres near the poles. But as you can see from our work, this theory doesn't stand up to careful scrutiny. We cited evidence from literature in the biological and geological fields. In fact. This literature is filled with objections to the so-called Ice Age.
For example, many of Norway¡¯s fjords are thought to have been carved out by large ice shields that slid down mountains, but the answer is still open.
"There is no place for the glacier to slide down here," Dreyer said. "The fjord is a huge crack in the surface, filled with the ice that formed later, and the inside of the fjord becomes very smooth due to the movement of the ice. But the result is The cause of the fjords is definitely not the ice.¡±
Evidence of so-called ice ages, such as surface cracks, deep trenches, ridges of rock and randomly scattered pebbles, also appear in places where ice ages did not occur.
Dreyer also told other scholars. These erroneous assumptions persist, and research grants that reward traditional results are largely responsible.
They always try to shoehorn all the evidence into the same outdated theory and hope that this theory will work for a long time. The scope is wide, creating many concepts such as ice ages.
Dreier also suggested that to piece together the maze of prehistory, humans will need expertise in various fields. What matters is. Dr. Allen devoted all his retirement energy to this research. His level of effort is almost unmatched by any conventionally employed researcher.
The picture painted by Allen, Dreyer, and others resembles that of a cataclysm that has been supported by overwhelming evidence as part of mythology.
On the other hand, the ice age theory has repeatedly failed to explain these strong evidences. In fact, this disaster is so huge that no origin civilization on earth will be spared. Allen and Dreier said it wouldn't even take a tragic asteroid or comet collision to cause such a serious disaster.
The cause of destruction does not need to be great. As long as it affects the earth's magnetic field, such as a star exploding. The super star ejects one or several burning fragments near us.
¡°In one case, the debris wandered around the solar system like a ball for almost nine years, disrupting the rotations and orbits of numerous planets through magnetic influence. This event caused terrible disasters on many planets and caused frequent earthquakes on the earth. But for the universe, this is just a small event of critical importance.
How is the global disaster almost a checkpoint in human progress? What does it mean to be human?
Almost all religious and myths are created by God, from the dust on the ground. The Bible clearly says: ¡°The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and he became a living being.¡±
This means that here, God created the human body and soul. Part of the physical material, the dust of the body, and part of the animal, the breath of the Creator, we call the soul.
Western religionists once said that God created the human body and soul. As for the Gnostics, all creators are demons, they are evil, they are creators who obey Satan, which is a satanic origin of the creator. Therefore, not only the body, but also the soul of some people, is evil and demonic.
This is a biological theory that religious believers firmly believe in. Considering the historical nature of religious inheritance and the many knowledge points gradually revealed by modern biology, this "theory of creation" is obviously more credible than Darwin's "theory of evolution."
And in the age of science and technology, the Ancient Literature Society improved modern biology by sorting out the research of ancient Taoist monks. In the field of biology, many fields were added that deal with the soul and consciousness, not just?It is a material thing.
But this is no longer just biology, but a kind of life science. It is a fundamental breakthrough in the knowledge system after human beings enter the era.
In this knowledge system, the most distinctive thing is the understanding of the phenomenon of "gnosis". Let¡¯s not delve into the existence form of animal life. Biologists from the Ancient Literature Society believe that humans are composed of three substances and three elements: body, soul and spirit.
According to the descriptions of ancient myths and stories, human bodies and souls were created by a certain god or higher being. The Great One created the body from dust and gave it the soul of His breath which passed through the breath into the nose of man
duyidu.
Read it
It can be seen from the ancient documents of various ethnic groups that the creator of each ethnic group may be the same, but it is most likely that they are different creators who created different skin colors. The discovery of genetics has made the ancient literature society Scientists favor this theory.
"Gnosis" has long been recognized as a kind of knowledge and the cause of the wisdom of life. This was recognized by many scholars in ancient times and is not a superstition. But "Gnosis" is a very special kind of knowledge.
For some reasons, this kind of knowledge involving the soul of life has always maintained a considerable degree of mystery. Gnosis is secret knowledge accessible only to those who deserve to possess it.
Throughout history, different religions have tried to maintain this kind of knowledge. However, in the era when scientism was prevalent, this kind of knowledge gradually withdrew from the mainstream ideology and was considered "non-scientific".
Even now, in many biological fields, the existence of soul and spirit is not recognized, and is only regarded as a biological body's own chemical reaction and a physical stress manifestation.
In the era of materialism, most people consciously or unconsciously reject this knowledge about spiritual perception. But in fact, without these, life is simply incomplete. Living things are not just carbohydrates, but have Deep stuff. To be continued. ) - Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report
- Previous pageCatalogNext page