So, according to the logic of the "Washington Times", isn't the United States the biggest supporter of terrorism? In recent years, with the rapid development of China's economy, China's military strength has indeed been enhanced, and the People's Liberation Army's strategic strike capabilities have been improved to a certain extent. However, this alone is considered to pose a threat to the United States. Obviously, China is considered a threat to the United States. It is also a ridiculous assertion with ulterior motives. As we all know, the fundamental reason why China strengthens its military strength is for self-defense and maintenance of national unity, not for hegemony and foreign aggression. Moreover, since the founding of New China, it has never launched an aggressive war, let alone a history of aggression.
Obviously, there is only one result of arguing that "China, Russia and Iran are the "new axis of evil" (with exceptions of course), and that is to arouse strong tribal emotions among the Chinese people. If the United States wants to eradicate "evil countries" "If she invades China like she did with Iraq (of course she wouldn't dare), then it goes without saying that more terrorists will be born.
Since the end of World War II, the United States has been deliberately improving its military power. Even when its military power has far exceeded that of any other country, it has still diligently sought and consolidated its military hegemony and relied on its superior military strength to frequently launch aggressive wars, which has brought great harm to the world. brought serious disaster. It can be seen that in today's world, the country that truly poses a substantial threat to human peace is the United States, which has always been keen to clamor and advocate the "China threat theory." Everyone knows that the United States today dislikes countries such as Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba, and calls them "evil countries." China only abides by the behavioral and moral norms of international relations. The fundamental purpose of developing relations with these countries is to safeguard national interests and human peace and development.
??In fact, the history of the development of the modern world shows. Since the founding of New China, apart from contributing to the anti-aggression wars of small and weak countries, it has never collaborated with other countries to bully other countries, and has always adhered to the diplomatic principle of "peaceful coexistence". On the contrary, the United States has been forging political and military alliances with other countries, and together with its allies has repeatedly launched a series of aggressive wars such as the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Kosovo War, and the Iraq War. Today, the "Washington Times" shamelessly describes the normal exchanges between China and those countries that the United States does not like. Wanton vilification and slander is obviously an out-and-out domineering act, and its evil face will surely be spurned by all peace-loving and kind-hearted people!
" Bin Laden and his sympathizers and supporters share the same tribal sentiment. And in a way that makes them feel part of the same tribe. Bin Laden was clearly dedicated to Islam and its tribes as An Le told us. Only then can we understand Bin Laden: no matter how bad he is; he clearly identifies himself with the tribe of Islam, not the tribe of Saudi Arabia, which is being raped. Bin Laden's sympathizers and supporters are not limited to Islamic tribes, but also include vulnerable countries and group tribes. Other tribes who feel the pressure and threat from the United States account for 80% of the total population.
??Under the global dictatorship headed by the United States. The world was forced to be divided into two simple and opposing tribes. Understanding this, it is not difficult to understand why there are so many sympathizers of Bin Laden. The United States does not understand that it is actually his aggressiveness and his ambition to dominate the world that make different tribes suddenly become one tribe, and thus produce the same tribal emotions.
The consequence is that more people will become terrorists, leading to the birth of more terrorists. To put it simply, wherever there is oppression, there is resistance. Many terrorists are just resisters at the beginning. These people were absolute heroes among their people, but they slowly evolved in the end. Under the control of some other people, the hero has become evil, and he can be regarded as an evil hero.
However, Xiao Yi doesn't care how those terrorists came out, because for them, the current terrorists are a cancer parasitic in the entire country of China. Not only are they unable to stabilize the country of China, but they will also become the largest There are hidden dangers, not to mention that these terrorists are not people who can control themselves, so at this time, it is normal to eliminate them.
There is no justice or evil in this, because from Xiao Yi's point of view, what they are doing is absolutely just. Fighting against terrorists is to fight against cancer and allow the entire country to settle down. But for these terrorists, what Xiao Yi is doing now makes it impossible for them to continue to survive. It is a kind of hegemony. They are weak resisters, and they are right. It can be seen from the fact that they changed the name of their base to Jihad that they feel very honorable for what they do.
Throughout the history of human wars, there has never been so-called justice or evil. Whether it is aggression or counter-invasion, if we look at it later, it is difficult to regard the reasons for local wars as justice or evil.Evil. Because for their citizens, the purpose of launching a war is to survive. Because the resources here are not enough for them to survive, they want to plunder and give themselves more living space.
There is a saying that says a lot, in the face of survival, no means can be used to turn on the evil side. Even Japan, which Xiao Yi has always hated, could not be considered an evil invader at the beginning, because at that time, Japan had to find a more suitable country to develop. This is a task given to them by their resources. They must do this if they want to develop, otherwise they will wait for destruction. This is not allowed by anyone.
At that time, China's national power was quite weak, especially after the Eight-Nation Allied Forces opened its door. China was just fat meat on the table at that time. If Japan didn't take a bite, they would really feel sorry for themselves, so for a while The reason for starting the war is not wrong, but when they are satisfied with their survival, they are controlled by their own desires and do what they do. That is the real sin.
The history of human wars can be seen as a history of survival. To survive, they must develop. When they develop to the limit, they must find a bigger place to survive. Therefore, wars between countries have never been sinful or noble, just Comparing whose fist is bigger, the person with the bigger fist conquers the person with the smaller fist, and the person with the smaller fist conquers the person who is weaker than them. It is the same as the law of the jungle, the big fish eats the small fish, and the small fish eats the shrimp.
In nature, when we see lions eating antelopes and big fish eating small fish, as human beings, it is estimated that not many people will condemn lions, saying that they are cruel and evil. Even the most powerful defenders will not Say these words. Why, because this is the rule, the rule of nature. It is normal for a lion to eat an antelope, because he wants to survive. No one is sorry for anyone, and the lion is not sorry for the antelope, because it is survival.
If we really want to say who is sorry to whom, then the lion is sorry for the antelope, the antelope is sorry for the grass, and the grass is sorry for the sunshine, the land and the rain. As for human beings, who are the spirits of all things, then everyone is really sorry. So there is no point in pursuing these, but such rules not only appear in nature, but also in humans, the big fish eats the small fish.
The strong conquer the weak, and the strong make the rules. This is an eternal truth, and it remains the same even now. So if you don't want to be conquered by others, then what you have to do is to make yourself stronger, otherwise everything will be in vain.
This principle can also be applied to war, but in war, why do evil and nobleness still arise? This is how they did it after solving the problem of survival. Take Japan for example. When Japan launched a war, many people didn't think it was a big deal, because their land area was small, but they had a large number of people. If they didn't rob them, they wouldn't be able to survive. So at this point, they There is no so-called evil, just being forced to do so by nature.
But when they occupy a place, their survival has been expanded, and survival is no longer the main goal, they have no way to control their desires. When a person uses his desires as his own rules of action, then these People can no longer be called people, which is why Japan's war is an evil war. What they did in the later period is something that a normal person would not be able to do.
During the period of the Anti-Japanese War, if we really want to count, all the resistance organizations at that time were terrorists. Of course, this was all in the eyes of Japan and those big countries. Because in their eyes, the Chinese country is so weak, and weak people are not allowed to resist. When a powerful country comes, what the other party has to do is not to resist, but to flatter, and to contribute everything it has. This is the main theme of the entire country, but China was resisting at that time, so China was a terrorist.
Just like in Iraq now, after the United States sent its troops there and encountered resistance, the United States directly labeled them as terrorists and did not treat them as opponents at all. What is the reason for this? It is not because the country is not strong. They can Dominate here. Just like an emperor who has fallen in love with your girl, all you have to do is kneel down and sing carols, and finally kiss the other person's toes and give your girl to the other person to enjoy without resisting.
Once you resist, in the eyes of the emperor, you are treason, you are rebellious, and you will be exterminated. This is often the case. Don't talk about original sin, because the biggest original sin is that you are not strong enough and do not have the strength to make rules. This is the other party's original sin. (To be continued)