In the case of "tribal affective disorder" prevention, one must first leave other people's lands, and then try to restore the patient's tribal pride rather than leaving it feeling frustrated. Obviously, if a person's tribal pride is abundant, then his tendency and reaction to choose violence will become dull or downplayed. He will have a sense of superiority, and thus be less sensitive to "offense", or be able to show that he is "offensive". "Have a more tolerant attitude. A Spaniard is always prone to "tribal affective disorder" or even sudden "tribal affective disorder" syndrome when abroad, because his tribal pride is easily frustrated abroad, and his tribal pride and superiority are at a deeper level. Deprivation state. This state of deprivation and other states of deprivation often prompt people to suddenly act violently or have violent tendencies. When a drug addict quits drugs, he will always show violent tendencies or a depressive state: Violent tendencies and depressive states are Basic withdrawal symptoms.
If we are trying to build a harmonious world, then, in addition to never invading the lands of other tribes, it is an indispensable condition to frequently praise other tribes on their own lands. When facing other tribes, we cannot look at the problem "objectively", because this so-called objectivity may entirely be unobjective due to tribal emotions; we must look at the problem from the tribal emotions of others and their needs; we cannot harm a tribe Or other tribes because the consequences even we as humanity cannot afford.
If we try to reduce or even eliminate terrorist attacks. Well, in my opinion. We must first recognize the personal, social, and environmental causes of terrorist attacks and suicide terrorist attacks, and try to first understand them correctly and diagnose them accurately. However, treatment and prevention not only transform and heal themselves, but also transform and heal our society.
Tribal emotions are like this, and can also be activated like this: Deep down in their hearts (in their tribal emotions), rich people all think and have always believed that poverty itself is immoral or a problem; because you are lazy or have problems. Other problems are of course just excuses. There is actually no reason for the rich to belittle the poor, because they and the poor belong to different tribes. And the government (strong tribes and corresponding tribal sentiments) always thinks. I have always believed that all acts of force against it are acts of terrorism, or acts of banditry. This is a cruel reality. Those anti-society and anti-government people can easily become heroes in some people's minds. Is there such a rare example in history? This is true no matter how bad, ignorant, or corrupt this government is. It is more cruel than Germany during the Third Reich, and even more ignorant of human rights than the United States during the First Reich. And always will be. For example, the Kuomintang government initially called the Communists red bandits. During the Japanese invasion of China. The Chinese resisters were all heinous in the eyes of the Japanese people and soldiers, so the Nanjing Massacre occurred: the Japanese explanation was that the city was massacred because of resistance.
But the Chinese people have been resenting this for decades, and they will continue to harbor this hatred. This hatred is especially buried in the psychology of China¡¯s conscientious, outstanding, great, and tribal-emotional intellectuals!
Obviously, if we want to truly eliminate terrorism, we must first eliminate aggression under any name because it touches people's tribal emotions. No matter how reasonable and necessary it seems on the surface, we cannot invade and occupy the lands of other tribes; To eliminate aggression. A desperate resistance must be carried out to teach the aggressors a lesson: aggression cannot achieve its goals; war cannot solve problems if it solves any problems. That's what it seems on the surface. Because suppressed anger will one day serve as a trigger, or burn some hatred that we just can't see, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. All the evil done by our ancestors will one day befall future generations.
In fact, a person with strong tribal identity and feelings is often an outstanding person. The only reason why some of them did not become terrorists, if their tribes fell into deep misfortune, was that they did not suffer from depression and addiction to violence at the same time or as a result; Tribal depression, they will become terrorists. Intellectuals or outstanding figures of the tribe are always those who have a rebellious and fighting spirit.
As far as personal efforts are concerned, the same sentence remains: we must have personal hobbies, and not one but multiple hobbies. Taking Siddique as an example, he is obviously not suitable for social work, because it would too activate or stimulate, or even deepen his tribal emotional disorder; as far as social efforts are concerned, at least we must recognize the strengths and advantages of other tribes. How reluctant we are, but we must do it. Because this is not only related to the interests of his tribe, but also the interests of this tribe.
Although it appears that this is exactly what we are doing and doing, it clearly does not go far enough: without harming one or the entire group.??and religion. If we want to limit war or confrontation to a certain person or groups of people, then we must do this in action and in the process of action, instead of dragging down the entire tribe or even some small groups like we are doing now. Squeezing tribes into large tribes, for example, squeezing many small tribes into one super tribe: the Islamic tribe, and then dragging them down as a whole. The Third Reich once did this: it divided the world into two tribes: one was the Axis tribe; the other was the Allied tribe, but it ended in failure.
As far as Sino-Japanese relations are concerned, when we oppose the Japanese right wing, we cannot drag the entire Japanese tribe into the water. Just as Japan opposes the Chinese left wing, we cannot drag the entire Chinese tribe into the water. No matter how powerful we (both sides) are We are reluctant to do so, but if we do not want war to occur or conflicts to escalate, we must do so, and to be effective does not mean to just sing high-pitched words, shout slogans, and unconsciously succumb to our own tribal emotions. It is clear though that everyone is subject to tribal emotions as Haurej points out, depicts and demonstrates. But to some extent it can be transcended.
¡°Obviously, though, there is a tribal emotional clock, though. It's apparently often inaccurate, has deviations, and can even run counterclockwise.
For example, people can be divided into some people who have slavish thoughts and emotions and always follow powerful individuals or tribes and neighboring tribes; some people are not afraid of rape and have strong tribal emotions and rebellious spirit. The latter is the driving force of the process of human history. main force. The former will always enjoy the benefits and become vested interests in any era. Unless the nation is in crisis, he is still a vested interest. His disaster appeared when the national crisis was lifted. Those who were loyal to neighboring tribes, such as the traitors during the Sino-Japanese War, had different tribal emotions than ordinary people. They can often transcend their own tribe without being burdened by it. For example, a Tianhai person or a Baodao person can suddenly transcend being a Chinese or a Chinese tribe and become a Japanese. For example, Li Deng Hui has Japanese tribal sentiments. The tribe to which he (they) belongs is always the stronger or greater tribe. on the contrary. some people. Their tribal emotions are often stimulated when their tribe is a weak and troubled tribe. The weaker the tribe is, the stronger their tribal emotions will be. This is in sharp contrast to Li Deng Hui and others.
Some people, such as Li Deng Hui and others, will definitely find Haureji's theory ridiculous, because they do not have positive tribal emotions such as what Haureji described. Therefore, they think Haureji is The nonsense is absolutely correct. Indeed, Haureji ignored these people. He brushed these people off as exceptions. But in fact, people with negative tribal feelings are far from the exception. It is a category. There are many Chinese people who say that Chinese people are dirty. When Chinese people go to foreign countries, there are many people who say that Chinese people are dirty, ignorant, backward, primitive. In short, there are many people who say that Chinese people are nothing. They are not exceptions. There are many such people. They have "the same religious concepts and cultural psychology" as the West and the United States, and their "applause and cheers" for the invasion and occupation. They called for the abolition of traditional Chinese medicine, "seemingly justified; some of them are from private individuals, and these people even live in "We are surrounded by people working in the same office as us, and even in some high administrative and academic positions." "This cannot help but make people vigilant, astonished, and even despairing. How can people become like this?" "The blood spurted out on the innocent", the homeland was trampled wantonly, "even animals may have feelings of compassion, but some people are high-fiving the executioner to express their congratulations."
Obviously, any nation has its scum (exceptions). They are either invaders or habitually stand on the opposite side of their own tribe. They can often be transformed into people from other tribes: for example, a Chinese has an American heart or a Japanese heart. ; Obviously they are weak or belong to the weak, but they stand in the position of the strong, speak for the strong, and have no sympathy or compassion for their own kind. On the contrary, he was overflowing with praise and sympathy for those who were different from him.
Obviously, the tribalism described by Hauregui is not all tribalism, because in fact there is also anti-tribalistic tribalism, that is, the tribalism of betraying one's own tribe and integrating into neighboring tribes (hostile tribes), such as the so-called "traitors" "Obviously, the "traitor" is not some (not a very few, but a group of people and therefore not an exception) people who do not have tribal emotions, but the bond of his tribal emotions is often with the neighboring tribe (hostile tribe or dominant tribe) Connected, connected to a powerful tribe, rather than inseparable from his native land (tribe). It is precisely because those people, although they betrayed their own tribe, had strong tribal sentiments and wholeheartedly defended neighboring tribes or hostile tribes that they did not look so insignificant, but instead appeared to be indignant, well-reasoned, courageous and knowledgeable, such as Li Deng Hui; Those Algerians who stand in France and condemn the heroes of Algeria; those who are Chinese and condemn the heroes of Islam, or othersPeople from small European countries, or intellectuals from weak countries, stand on the side of strong France. They identify France as belonging to the same tribe as themselves, but France will never accept his fate as a traitor, which proves this: One day he will be abandoned by both his own tribe and neighboring tribes, becoming a real lost dog. As Hauregyi mentioned: Russians will always be Russians, and Americans will not treat Russians as dogs. As an American, you can rest assured that treating someone¡¯s nationality based on blood, the same place of birth or the same hometown does not change a person¡¯s tribal attributes. Of course, there are other groups, the so-called exceptions, that is, even if they do not have the nationality of a certain country at all , but their hearts are the hearts of a certain country, and they have no tribal emotions that are closely connected with their own tribe. The problem is that even these people who betray their own tribe can also become more dangerous terrorists. Of course, this is a blessing for the tribe, but it is a blessing for the neighboring tribes.
In my opinion, the most dangerous terrorists are not those who are heroes of their own tribe or terrorists in the eyes of other tribes, but those who have the heart of the neighboring tribe and the tribal emotions connected to the enemy tribe because they are also backed by tribal emotions. , so he (they) can do anything to betray the tribe. It's just that today they are condemning the terrorism of the Islamic tribes, but yesterday or tomorrow, they (they) should have condemned the "terrorism" of those tribes who put up desperate resistance to the invasion of their tribes, but they were ) is undoubtedly the hero of this tribe.
As history has unmistakably shown time and time again!
In my opinion, the real terrorists that the world considers terrorists are those who are not only hated by their own tribe, but also despised by their neighboring tribes!
In fact, there are at least three types of terrorists: one is terrorists who defend the interests of their own tribe, that is, labeled terrorists; one is terrorists who invade other tribes, and they are also labeled terrorists; One is the terrorists who destroy the interests of their own tribe and betray their own tribe, that is, the real terrorists. The latter are those who are loyal to the neighboring tribes. For the West, extreme condemnation of Islamic terrorists is as normal as France is for Algeria. But as a Chinese, there is a problem in condemning Islamic terrorists, just like a Russian condemning Islamic terrorists. This is really worrying. As a Russian, like Putin, he should feel some pressure from the West, NATO, and the United States, resulting in a sense of crisis, and thus arouse strong tribal emotions to defend the interests of his tribe, which is similar to the Islamic tribe. tribal feelings of sympathy for each other (it can even be said that, to a certain extent, under certain circumstances, Russia, China, and Islamic countries belong to the same tribe), rather than treating Islamic tribes from the standpoint of the West, NATO, and the United States The defiance issued a solemn accusation. (To be continued)