The same freedom is actually divided into different levels
The freedom of ordinary people is often limited to the order of ordinary people's lives. In fact, in a sense, it cannot be regarded as real freedom. It is just that under the background and environment in which they live, they feel that they have Free enough, that's all!
For ordinary people, as long as they have enough money, good health, and a social environment with comfortable and stable social order and fair justice, they are basically very free, and they can choose to do whatever they want. They don¡¯t need to worry about money or illness to do what they want. They can do whatever they want. Even if they occasionally break the law, they can use money to clear the way and minimize their punishment
In a sense, this kind of freedom is enough for ordinary people
Not everyone calls Superman, and not everyone wants to be Superman
Being able to live a life that is superior to others among ordinary people, for most people, is actually worth fighting for their whole life
However, this kind of freedom itself cannot actually be regarded as freedom in the true sense
At least, this kind of freedom is not the freedom You Yue pursues!
The reason is simple
People are always going to die, people are always going to age, and there are always things that are impossible for people to do
The so-called manpower is sometimes exhausted, this is the truth
No matter what kind of person you are, there will always be times when you are powerless. No matter how much money you have, no matter how much power you have, no matter how high your status, there will always be times when you are helpless
And this helplessness, in a sense, is precisely a manifestation of unfreedom
Of course, the vast majority of people, deep down in their hearts, will filter out this so-called lack of freedom, or lack of perfection
Because in the perception of many people, this kind of perfection itself is unattainable. Because it is unattainable, all people will pursue relative freedom instead of absolute freedom
And only those who can pursue relative freedom will try to pursue the so-called absolute freedom!
Just like the emperors in ancient times, when they had the supreme power, when their country was peaceful and the weather was smooth, their eyes would naturally fall on higher goals, such as cultivating to become an immortal. , such as immortality
Etc., etc¡¡
Of course, in the final analysis, cultivating to become an immortal and becoming immortal are actually the same ideal. Immortality is a pursuit of survival, while cultivating to become an immortal is based on survival and at the same time improves the quality of survival. needs
Of course, different people have different priorities in pursuing the two. Some people prefer immortality, while some people would rather live a shorter period of time and also want to pursue powerful power
Of course, more often than not, the relationship between immortality and powerful power is a coexistence
Simply being immortal or simply possessing power is an unreasonable state in itself
??The immortals must have strong power, and individuals with strong power usually have long lives
The two themselves can be said to be inevitable
In fact, in many hot-blooded Japanese comics, the two are always separated. For example, a strong man who can destroy the world will slowly die of old age after a period of time
This is an unreasonable state in itself
Of course, pursuing reasonableness in hot-blooded comics is meaningless. For readers, as long as the plot is exciting enough, it is enough
In fact, if a person is simply immortal but does not have the power to match his lifespan, then this person will eventually become an experiment in the hands of the powerful and live in pain and suffering every day. On the contrary, , if a person has strong power, but does not have a strong enough body and strong enough vitality to carry this power, then when the vitality is squeezed to the limit by the force, death will come in a short time ¡
Just like the untimely death of many martial artists, there are usually similar reasons, that is, they practice martial arts too fiercely, the intensity of martial arts training increases, their strength increases too quickly, and they even use some too radical methods to exercise their bodies. muscles in order to cause maximum damage.??And then due to being too radical, the body was overwhelmed and eventually died suddenly
?????????????????????????? It is the body that cannot bear this kind of force that exceeds the body's limit, which leads to the body's collapse
By the same token, pure force is enough to have a negative impact on the body, and those various extraordinary abilities naturally put a much heavier burden on the body. If there is no vitality that matches the strength, Carrying this extraordinary power is simply an act of oneself
Because of this, all immortals are usually powerful, and powerful people can often survive longer
Of course, animals such as tortoises, which have much longer lifespans than humans but are relatively weak, also exist in nature. But in the final analysis, it is because although tortoises live long lives, they do not actually exceed the human level. In fact, they live longer than humans, but in fact they don¡¯t live much longer. As for the old turtles that are said to live for hundreds or even thousands of years, they have probably become spirits and turned into monsters. Among monsters, The combat power may be very weak, but compared to ordinary humans, it is definitely a crushing rhythm
" Immortality in a pure sense, or destruction of heaven and earth in a pure sense, actually do not exist. The strong must live long, and the immortal must also be strong
¡°If a strong man¡¯s lifespan is short, then his combat effectiveness will also be weakened to the extreme state. There is also a state of mutual balance between vitality and combat effectiveness¡
And if a certain exercise method or training system can greatly enhance an individual's combat effectiveness, but it will not increase lifespan, but will shorten one's lifespan, then this exercise method or training system is actually on the wrong path. It's just an evil land
In fact, in many cultivation novels, the difference between the righteous and the evil sect is usually not the character of the good and the evil. There will be scum among the decent sects of famous families, and there will also be upright people among the evil sects. A hero appears
The most fundamental way to distinguish is actually the cultivation methods and concepts of both parties
The practice of decent people generally tends to pursue a stable foundation. When pursuing a stable foundation, they choose to gradually improve their strength. This is also the practice philosophy of this type of cultivators. They will not do anything to improve their strength. When something harmful happens, what they pursue is to steadily improve their cultivation and state of mind
On the contrary, the practice of evil sects tends to rob and achieve quick results. No matter what kind of practice method, most of them can be effective in a short time and are extremely lethal. However, this type of practice usually has There are more or less flaws, so they can only keep looking for new techniques to make up for the flaws, and then the flaws will become more and more numerous. In the end, even if the flaws are made up, their personalities may change drastically. Become a complete devil
Of course, no matter whether you are a righteous sect or an evil sect, the ultimate goal of practice is to achieve immortality. The only difference is that the two choose different ways, but the end result is the same
Not to mention the upright bosses, many evil sect bosses, when their level reaches a certain level, will naturally turn to some Buddhist or Taoist classics to make up for the shortcomings caused by their own practice. Over time, such people will naturally become a being of good and evil. In fact, the vast majority of powerful practitioners in the true sense are usually neither good nor evil
After reaching a certain level of cultivation, they no longer have many concepts of justice or evil. Most of the time, they do things for themselves. They follow their own heart in everything they do, and that's all
The freedom of ordinary people and the freedom of extraordinary people can be said to be two completely different concepts!
The freedom of ordinary people is essentially an illusory freedom
But the freedom of the extraordinary is real freedom!
They are pursuing this unobtainable freedom almost all the time!
For them, the freedom of ordinary people can be said to be within easy reach, but what they pursue is a freedom that ordinary people cannot even imagine!
In fact, personal strength, in a sense, is the most important condition for a person to gain freedom
However, in the world of ordinary people, individual strength is not enough for people to have freedom. Compared with wealth, compared with power, compared with reputation, strong personal power can be said to be nothing worth mentioning. matter¡¡
However, this is not because the individual's power is useless, but because the individual's power is not strong enough!
? ?Yeah, it's not strong enough!
Strong and weak are relative concepts in themselves, not absolute!
Ordinary people, even if they practice martial arts and exercise their bodies, and are strong in society, they certainly belong to the type of martial arts and powerful people, but this strength itself is not actually enough to subvert society. order, for example, if he uses his own force to attack others, he will probably not be able to escape the law in the end. Even if he is stronger than ordinary people, he is still not strong enough to subvert the social order or affect the social order. The existence of the state apparatus¡
Such people do not have the ability to subvert order by relying on their own strength
¡°At best, you can just be a gangster on the street, doing some sneaky things, or if you have enough talent, you may be able to become a gangster, and then you will inevitably eat a peanut
At least under the domestic social environment, there is no room for any evil forces to survive. Maybe they can be developed in the development stage, but once they grow, they will definitely be cut off. Basically, they have a head and a good face. No one can escape the fate of being shot
¡°Personal force in a pure sense is actually very difficult to pose a threat to society, and as long as it does not exceed the limits of social order, then this threat can be ignored
Compared with this kind of gangsters, there is another type of people who can often pose a greater threat to society, and that is veterans who have had military experience. If this type of people can find firearms, then they can pose a greater threat to society. The destructive power caused is far beyond what people like gangsters can compare with. Whether in the police force or the army, the loss of any firearm is a very, very, very serious incident. Anyone with a military background The appearance of gunmen is enough to trigger relevant alarms from the police and military
Once such people do evil things, they are usually very scary and dangerous. And because of this, once such people are identified, whether it is the police or the military, they will choose to kill them as soon as they are discovered. It's not an arrest, because the risk factor is too high. The arrest itself is a risky behavior, and being able to kill it is a matter of course
In fact, why domestic crackdowns occur is because this type of thing happens too frequently, which ultimately leads to the rise of a wave of crackdowns
In fact, for such desperadoes, the country's policy will usually never compromise. It counts if one can be killed, because their existence itself threatens the security of the country and the stability of society. The most important thing is , even if they are a threat to the country, they are within the scope that the country can solve. Basically, it is difficult for such criminals to get a good death
In fact, for the same reason, although many kidnappers are cunning and always make many different demands, many of them will be directly killed by snipers who find opportunities during the transaction process. The safety of the hostages is naturally of paramount importance. It is an important thing, but if conditions permit and the opportunity is good enough, then the police sniper will never miss such an opportunity!
The reason is very simple. No matter how complicated the case is, if the kidnapper is killed, the case will be solved
As for the safety of the hostages, it is certainly necessary to consider, but sometimes it is allowed to allow the hostages to bear a certain degree of risk, especially when the police determine that the kidnappers may pose a security threat to the hostages if they continue to survive. At that time, letting the hostages bear certain risks would actually not put much psychological burden on the police. After all, the two powers harm each other, whichever is less. In fact, such a choice cannot be said to be right or wrong ¡
In fact, from the police's standpoint, although on the surface the safety of the hostages comes first, in fact killing the prisoner is usually the first option considered by the police, because every time a kidnapper is killed, it is actually a This is an invisible deterrent to other kidnappers, and every time a kidnapper escapes, it is an invisible encouragement to other kidnappers. The gap between the two is undoubtedly very huge