-
Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading
Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Comics -> Legend of Assassin in Fantasy World Chapter 2023
Previous page Return to Catalog Next page
- Pirates dividing gems is itself a logical process of reverse thinking
From the perspective of pirate No. 5, if it is Pirate No. 4¡¯s turn to distribute gems, he will definitely choose to oppose it. Even if No. 4 votes in favor, it will not pass because the opposition and approval are equal. No. 5 is assigned all the gems. No. 5 can kill the opponent through opposition, and then get all the gems alone
And from the perspective of pirate No. 4, when he realizes that he cannot distribute the gems no matter what, he will understand that he must support No. 3¡¯s decision no matter what. How pirate No. 4 distributes the gems, No. 4 can only choose to support but not oppose. Under this premise, No. 3¡¯s decision will definitely be passed
In other words, from the perspective of pirate No. 3, if it is his turn to distribute, the way he distributes it must be to give one hundred to himself and not give any gems to the other two pirates, because even if No. 4 does not give Gems will never refuse his proposal, and even if No. 5 gives him all the gems, he will not agree to his distribution. All No. 3's distribution method must be to swallow the gems alone
In a sense, No. 3 very much hopes to distribute the gems by himself. Therefore, for Pirate No. 2, it is impossible to bribe the pirate No. 3. Pirate No. 2 wants to obtain the maximum benefit, and the only way is The method is to allocate one gem to No. 4 and one gem to No. 5. Only in this way can we obtain the maximum benefit. The reason is very simple. For No. 4 or No. 5, they know very well that if No. 3 is allowed to allocate , then they will get nothing, so as long as they can get more benefits than allocated by No. 3, they will be willing to vote for No. 2.
Because of this, the distribution method for all No. 2 numbers is 98, 0, 1, 1. This is also a way to maximize the income of No. 2 numbers!
Next, all questions return to the original No. 1
The allocation method of No. 1 is very simple. First of all, it is impossible for him to win over No. 2, because he needs too many chips to win over No. 2. If he wants to get the maximum benefit, then wooing No. 3 is the best choice, because if No. 2 is To decide the allocation, then No. 3 will get nothing, so No. 1 only needs to give No. 3 a gem to get the support of No. 3. Next, for No. 4 and No. 5, if No. 1 only gives If they have a gem, they will not agree with the allocation method of No. 1, because even if No. 1 dies, they can still get a gem steadily
So No. 1 must take out two gems and give them to one of No. 4 or No. 5 to gain support
Generally speaking, there is no difference between giving to No. 4 or No. 5, because no matter which one you give, you can get support and the allocation method will be established
And this is the result of reason!
On the surface, it seems that the farther back the people are allocated, the safer their lives are. In theory, they should have the greatest initiative, but in fact, those who have mastered the rules and opportunities of the game are often the ones with the most power. People who take the initiative!
Of course, the prerequisite for the establishment of this distribution method is absolute reason!
In other words, when conditions are favorable, no one will do something that harms others and does not benefit oneself!
In reality, if there is no absolute reason, the situation may be very different!
If irrational factors are taken into account, in a sense, for No. 1, the result of allocating two gems to No. 4 may be better than the result to No. 5
What is the reason?
It¡¯s very simple, because the existence of No. 5 itself is actually completely risk-free!
For No. 5, his life is absolutely safe. In other words, if Pirate No. 5 is willing, he can theoretically murder Pirate No. 1 by giving up a gem as a price
In fact, let alone pirate number 5, even pirate number 3 actually has the possibility of directly murdering pirate number 1!
After all, for Pirate No. 3, as long as Pirate No. 1 and Pirate No. 2 are dead, he will have the opportunity to obtain the greatest benefit!
For pirates No. 4 and 5, when No. 3 starts to allocate, they actually have no choice. Because of the way No. 3 is allocated, No. 4 must agree and No. 5 must oppose. Before, They can exchange gems for the distributor's life, but at this time, they will not gamble their lives with others for more gems!
When No. 3 is assigned, No. 4 can murder No. 3, but while No. 4 is murdering No. 3, he is actually??It's like murdering yourself
No. 4 would never do such a thing under any circumstances!
In other words, if an accident occurs, the most likely beneficiary may just be Pirate No. 3!
Of course, if No. 4 is irrational and asks No. 3 to get half of the gems before agreeing to the other party's allocation, otherwise they will both perish, then it is actually very likely that No. 3 will finally give in. After all, gambling is Not everyone dares to risk their lives. Number 4 does not dare to risk their lives, and Number 3 actually does not dare to risk their lives either
After all, sanity in an absolute sense rarely appears in reality!
As long as you are a human being, you will have a sense of comparison and a mentality of comparing yourself with others
The so-called don¡¯t fight for the steamed buns, but fight for the tone! This is the truth!
The so-called absolute rationality, if viewed from another perspective, may actually be very mentally retarded!
To give a simple example, if there are 100 yuan, it is divided between A and B. The rules are as follows. First, A will distribute the 100 yuan, and then B will judge whether to accept A's distribution method. If B If B accepts A's distribution method, then the two people will distribute the one hundred yuan in this way. If B does not accept A's distribution method, then no one can get the one hundred yuan
So how should A allocate the one hundred dollars?
If we think about it from an absolutely rational perspective, A's most ideal distribution method is ninety-nine to one. At this time, B actually faces two choices. One is to accept, which can make a profit of one dollar. , one is to refuse and then get nothing.
From a rational point of view, B should accept this distribution, because this distribution is at least more beneficial than getting nothing!
But in fact, the vast majority of people will not agree with this distribution method, at least in their logic. Instead of accepting this unfair distribution method, it is better to break up and let everyone not take the money. Well come!
This is also the difference between rationality and sensibility
Rational people judge choices based more on whether they can benefit from their choices. They will not care about whether other people benefit from their choices, but only care about their own part. On the contrary, emotional people People often not only care about their own interests, but also care about whether the benefits obtained by themselves and others are fair enough. If he feels unfair, then he would rather break up than endure humiliation!
From this perspective, if we look back at the problem of pirates distributing gems, we will find that although pirate No. 1 can theoretically get the greatest benefit, in fact, there are still many risks in this distribution itself. , and on the contrary, although Pirate No. 5 may gain nothing, at least his own safety can be guaranteed in an absolute sense. Even if others are stupid, he will not have no chance to get the treasure alone!
Of course, the fundamental reason why this is the case is actually based on the premise that the brother pirates and the others are not equal in their rationality!
The pirates who proposed the distribution method based their rationality on their own lives, and the same rationality for other pirates, their rationality was only based on the number of gems distributed!
Life and gems are undoubtedly more valuable than life, so in a sense, the rational bottom line of both parties is not equal!
The life of the allocator is actually based on whether the voters are greedy enough. Without absolute reason as a constraint, such a distribution method itself cannot be established!
Unless the value of the gem reaches a very terrifying level, it is possible for the pirates to remain sane in an absolute sense!
The same is the example of dividing money. If one dollar is divided among one hundred dollars, the vast majority of people will choose to reject such a distribution method. But if one hundred million is divided among ten billion, then I am afraid that almost everyone Everyone will choose to accept it
The reason is very simple. In this money-sharing story, what measures the behavior of both parties is actually human dignity!
When the former uses extremely outrageous proportions to distribute, it actually hurts the dignity of the latter. The latter will naturally not give up their dignity for small interests, and they will naturally choose to break up
However, when the amount of money rises to tens of billions or even higher, the latter will not consider the issue of dignity, because for the vast majority of people, dignity is not worth 100 million and can be obtained for free. 100 million, but refused because of inner imbalance, this is notHe has some backbone, but he is incredibly stupid
In the final analysis, in a sense, when faced with a decision with greater benefits, people's reason will have the upper hand!
On the contrary, when faced with life and death, the vast majority of people will more or less lose their minds. For example, many people know that they will not live long, but they still find it difficult to face this reality and would rather drag themselves down by lingering. Their family members cannot face the fate of death calmly. Of course, this has nothing to do with the so-called good and evil of human nature, it is just the survival instinct in a simple sense!
When facing death, most people will feel panic. Being able to face death calmly is already considered a very remarkable thing. But if you want to be rational enough to take advantage of your own death, that is another level. Got it!
At this moment, You Yue is preparing to take advantage of her own death!
Yes, use it!
For You Yue, who is in a transcendent state, his life and death have long been beyond his thoughts
For him, life and death in dreams are themselves nothingness. If he is afraid of death, he will never be able to truly solve his dilemma
He knows very well that for him, the real trouble does not come from this dream-like world, but from his own thinking!
He has a feeling that his true power seems to be blocked by an invisible force. For himself, only by truly breaking the shackles of this seal can he realize his own awakening and truly find himself!
Compared to finding yourself again, death is nothing!
The so-called life is precious and love is expensive. If it is for freedom, both can be thrown away. This is the truth!
Of course life is precious, and love is of course precious, but compared to true freedom, it is insignificant. If a person is alive and cannot be truly free, then there is actually no difference between living and dying. Got it!
"It's like a person who has lost his memory and the person who has the memory are actually not the same person. Without the memory of the past, strictly speaking, he can only be regarded as a brand new person
Just like why many schizophrenics or mentally ill people can be exempted from criminal responsibility, the fundamental reason is this. If a person commits a crime because of mental illness, but he does not know his criminal behavior, then his actual It is equivalent to not committing a crime. Of course, it is difficult to prove whether a person is schizophrenic. As long as there is a certain degree of subjective intention in the criminal behavior, it is difficult to achieve complete immunity
From You Yue¡¯s perspective, the self who has lost her memory is actually no longer herself!
And the most important thing is that the biggest difference between You Yue and the amnesiac is that she is not simply amnesiac, but at the same time she has lost her memory, a large part of her thinking and logical abilities have been completely deprived!
This feeling is actually very unbearable!
That is a very contradictory feeling!
On the one hand, it is the objective reality, on the other hand, it is the feeling in the heart
In objective reality, You Yue knew very well that she was no match for the mechanical killing machine in front of her. With her fighting power at this time, she might be able to dodge the flying disc cutting once or twice before. , but the final death is destined to be inevitable
But in her inner feelings, You Yue could vaguely feel that the machine in front of her was actually not that powerful
This feeling is like being in an examination room. Candidates often feel that a test question is not difficult, but they can't find a solution to the question anyway
This is a similar ambivalence
On the one hand, I feel that I can¡¯t do it, but in my heart, I feel that I should be able to do it easily! - Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report
- Previous pageCatalogNext page