Add Bookmark | Recommend this book | Back to the book page | My bookshelf | Mobile Reading

Free Web Novel,Novel online - All in oicq.net -> Romance -> Rising director

Text 0343 [Farewell, Spielberg]

Previous page        Return to Catalog        Next page

    Darfur.  Located in the west of South Sudan, it covers an area of ??approximately 250,000 square kilometers and has an estimated population of 6 million.  Darfur borders the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Chad, the Central African Republic and the Republic of South Sudan.  Darfur consists of three states, namely North Darfur, West Darfur and South Darfur.  There are more than 80 tribes living here, including Arabs, Furs and blacks. Among them, Arabs who believe in Islam mostly live in the north, while indigenous black people who believe in Christianity live in the south.  In the 1960s and 1970s, with population expansion and overgrazing, desertification here continued to intensify. Arab herdsmen who were accustomed to living by water were forced to move south, and they clashed with local black tribes over competition for water and grass resources.  Due to the long-term armed conflicts between tribes in Darfur, many places in the region have been in a state of anarchy and chaos.  Historically, because the borders of Sudan were artificially drawn when European powers carved up Africa and implemented colonial rule in the 19th century, many tribes in Darfur were assigned to different countries. Therefore, the tribes in the region have thousands of connections with neighboring countries.  Inextricably linked.  In recent years, with the continuous development of oil and other mineral resources in Darfur, the struggle between tribes for resources has become increasingly fierce, and some neighboring countries have also been involved in various forms.  In February 2003, black residents in Darfur formed two rebel armed forces, the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, demanding autonomy on the grounds that the government failed to protect the rights and interests of indigenous black people.  So the Sudanese government.  The war with rebel forces began, with both sides fighting.  All caused a large number of casualties.  At the same time, the West, led by the United States, changed its previous attitude of indifference and indifference after 2004 and intervened in the Darfur issue with a high profile.  He also actively pushed for the United Nations to issue a policy that defined the Sudanese government's war against rebel forces as a genocide.  And asked China, which cooperates with the Sudanese government to develop resources, to recognize and promote the confirmation of the genocide.  and jointly sanction the Sudanese government.  As we all know, in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, China's diplomatic strategy was to unite countries in the third world. African brothers were the main helpers for China to regain its seat in the United Nations.  In Africa, especially in Sudan, the Chinese government has maintained a good cooperative relationship with the Sudanese government.  ??And Sudan is an extremely poor country, in this case.  Sanctions will only worsen the humanitarian situation in Sudan, and once the Sudanese government is found guilty of genocide, the head of the Sudanese government will definitely be sent to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. The Sudanese government will be finished, and China will break its trust with its African brothers.  The United States has successfully pushed China into a dilemma by using the strategy of genocide.  Facing the Western countries led by the United States to set up a trap.  The Chinese government has upheld justice without hesitation and stands with the Sudanese government. It does not recognize that this is a genocide but a development issue, nor does it recognize that sanctions on Sudan will have a positive effect on the Darfur issue.  Therefore, he resolutely voted against it at the United Nations General Assembly.  The U.S. policy is stillborn.  As a result, off-the-shelf tactics appeared, and public opinion began to be mobilized to claim that China was inhumane on the Darfur issue and that China had not fulfilled its responsibilities for the Darfur issue.  What¡¯s even uglier is that while the U.S. government is telling the outside world that it does not support linking the Darfur issue to the Olympics, members of the House of Representatives are clamoring for a boycott of the Olympics, and have mobilized influential private figures such as Hollywood and the NBA to boycott the 2008 Beijing Olympics.  Olympic Games.  The shameless tricks are unprecedented.  Even in the media, a boycott declaration was openly launched in the name of Olympic Committee Chairman Rogge.  Although Rogge came forward to clarify that he did not say that and apologized.  But the purpose of public opinion has been achieved, and countless people from the sports, entertainment and cultural circles around the world who do not know the truth have begun to boycott.  When the Olympic torch was forced to reroute due to safety concerns, the BBC host actually laughed out loud several times during the live broadcast of the news, showing unabashed gloating and saying, "(The torch relay encountered interference)  ) is embarrassing to the International Olympic Committee, embarrassing to the Chinese government, and embarrassing to the city of San Francisco.¡±  In the "Situation Room" program, CNN news commentator Cafferty attacked the Olympic torch relay while using vicious language to slander the Chinese. He actually said, "In the past 50 years, the Chinese have basically  Always a gang of thugs and gangsters.¡±  In the "O'Reilly Facts" talk show, Fox News Channel host O'Reilly and hilarious guest star Miller couldn't wait to support the anti-China forces and taught the audience how to "embarrass the Chinese."  Some anti-China politicians in the West have shown their lack of restraint without any sense of restraint, not only talking about Darfur, but also talking about the Tibetan issue.  German Chancellor Merkel,After taking office, former German Chancellor Schroeder changed his friendly policy toward China and frequently put pressure on China. Recently, the German government announced that Chancellor Merkel and her government officials in charge of sports development would not attend the opening of the Olympic Games.  Merkel also said that although her meeting with Dalai last September affected the relationship between Germany and China, she was willing to meet with Dalai again.  Pelosi, the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, who is known as "not a woman", is passionate about "Tubo independence" and instigates a "boycott of the Olympics". She calls on President Bush to refuse to attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics. She spares no effort in passing anti-China resolutions on Tibetan issues.  .  French President Sarkozy publicly stated during his visit to the UK that "everything is possible" regarding the boycott of the Beijing Olympics.  US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton recently publicly called on current President Bush to boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.  On the contrary, it was her husband, former US President Clinton, who made it clear that he opposed a boycott of the Beijing Olympics.  Czech President Klaus stated that he will boycott the opening ceremony of the 29th Olympic Games to be held in Beijing due to the Chinese government's quelling the violence of beating, smashing, looting and burning in the Tibetan Autonomous Region and will not participate in the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.  Lantos, a former US congressman who is famous for being anti-China and a "China black", not only voted against the United States granting China the status of a normal trading country.  He also strongly opposed Beijing's hosting of the 2008 Olympic Games, falsely claiming that "China is not qualified to enjoy this honor."  Bao Ping, deputy mayor of Paris, recently made a fallacy.  The International Olympic Committee should warn that the Olympics will be moved to Athens unless China commits to improving its human rights record.  The President of Poland announced that he would not attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics and would instead meet with Dalai.  He even told the media that he was the first person to boycott the Beijing Olympics and was proud of it.  Because the Darfur issue triggered an unprecedented political crisis for the Beijing Olympics, Western countries did not hesitate to use various excuses such as Tibet and human rights.  Boycott the Beijing Olympics.  This will undoubtedly put tremendous pressure on China, which is eager to show off itself.  It is under this circumstance that the Chinese government began to work hard to seek more support.  Pakistani President Musharraf, International Olympic Committee President Rogge, US President Bush, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Samaranch, Obama, African Union Chairman-in-Office, British Prime Minister Brown, Russian Speaker of the House, German Foreign Minister, Danish Foreign Minister, Serbia  The foreign minister and other international dignitaries have clearly supported the Beijing Olympics.  After ensuring that it would not be isolated politically, the country began to mobilize civil society again, and internationally influential stars all supported the government.  Refute Western biased reporting.  Overseas Chinese from all over the world also took to the streets to demonstrate in support of the Beijing Olympics and to protest against foreign media's distortion of facts on issues such as Darfur and Tibet.  In such a noisy environment, Spielberg¡¯s resignation statement had an astonishing impact.  Put China to death.  In the eyes of many people, Spielberg is just a Hollywood director.  The fact is just the opposite. Spielberg¡¯s influence is beyond imagination.  He can be said to be the spiritual leader of Hollywood.  The director with the highest cumulative box office in Hollywood and one of the three giants of DreamWorks.  The films he made influenced people all over the world.  In the United States, almost everyone does not know Spielberg, who is undoubtedly the most famous celebrity.  Among the Jews, Spielberg is also one of the well-deserved leaders.  Because of his resignation, it can almost be said that Hollywood has clearly boycotted the Beijing Olympics, and the Jewish world will also join the boycott.  Now, among the Chinese in the entertainment industry, who can resist Spielberg¡¯s influence?  Wan Xiaohu could barely resist one or two.  After communicating with his father-in-law Su Zhicheng, Wan Xiaohu also held a press conference and issued a statement on "qingren" Day on February 14, 2008, the third day after Spielberg's statement. ?¡­ ?Farewell, Spielberg.  Not long ago, American director Spielberg resigned as artistic consultant for the Beijing Olympics because of the Darfur issue.  Mr. Spielberg believes that China has not fulfilled its responsibilities towards Darfur.  ¡°I don¡¯t know how China can fulfill its responsibility in Mr. Spielberg¡¯s opinion.  It is reported that Spielberg supports the Iraq war. Does China have to learn from the United States' approach to Iraq, break off political and economic relations with Sudan, send out troops to fight in Darfur?  Regarding the Darfur issue, the Chinese government provided timely international humanitarian assistance, providing a loan of US$80 million to build a water plant, fundamentally solving one of the root causes of the war, water shortage, and at the same time raising a large amount of materials to assist refugees.  China is also the first country to send peacekeeping troops into Darfur.  Mr. Spielberg, should we go to Darfur first?Look, listen to what the mainstream of the international community and Darfur refugees say about the Chinese government, and then make a decision?  China is a country of etiquette and benevolence. Under the instructions of Premier Zhou, we adhere to the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.  The Chinese people keep their word. We never invade others and insist on peace because we understand the value of peace and war is not a necessary means to solve problems.  "Thank you Mr. Spielberg for treating me as a good friend. In the past, I would have been very happy.  When I was young, I grew up watching Hollywood movies. When I entered film school, my teachers were always explaining the beauty of Hollywood movies.  At that time, Spielberg was the idol of many of our directing students.  When I saw "Schindler's List", I was so shocked that I felt for the suffering of the Jews, because during World War II, China also suffered from the iron hoof of Japanese militarism, and 17.8 million soldiers fell under Japanese guns.  , 17.4 million civilians were innocently killed by the Japanese.  During the eight years of resistance against Japan, we also received help from people from all walks of life internationally.  The bloody tragedy has taught the Chinese people the value of peace.  I think Mr. Spielberg recognized this truth. I knew it when he made "Schindler's List."  But I think Mr. Spielberg is also forgetful. He remembered Schindler's aid to the Jews, but forgot the Chinese's aid to the Jews.  While China was suffering harm from the Japanese invaders, Mr. He Fengshan, who served as the Chinese Consul General in Vienna from 1938 to 1940, issued "life visas" to 18,000 Jews who were about to go to the slaughterhouse.  Historical facts have proven that this act of charity is more commendable than the German businessman Schindler's act of saving 110 Jews during World War II.  As the director of "Schindler's List", does Mr. Spielberg know that 60 years ago, there was a Chinese diplomat who, despite the Nazis, protected the Jews who were living in despair at that time?  Do you know how many Jews settled in the capital at that time and were protected by the Chinese government?  Today, China is also assisting the refugees in Darfur in the spirit of international humanitarianism. Why did Mr. Spielberg listen to other people's beliefs and make a surprising act of "righteous indignation"? If Mr. Spielberg was  During the Second World War, would they have believed the Nazis' words and believed that the Chinese diplomat Mr. He Fengshan was trafficking in Jewish people?  Mr. Spielberg, does he know that your actions have deeply hurt the peace-loving Chinese people?  Today, the Beijing Olympic Organizing Committee issued a statement expressing "regret" for your resignation.  This is so generous, generous and even a little contemptuous.  Our Chinese people's attitude is very clear. No matter what kind of rumors and threats, China will still be China, the capital will still be the capital, and the Olympics will still be the Olympics.  This will be the most successful Olympic Games in history. This is the guarantee of the Chinese people.  Goodbye, Spielberg.  You are no longer a friend of the Chinese people, and you are no longer my friend. You have shown us clearly how ugly some people are underneath their sanctimony.  Spielberg is gone, the Olympic boycott is coming, good, good.  Both of these things are worth celebrating!
Didn't finish reading? Add this book to your favoritesI'm a member and bookmarked this chapterCopy the address of this book and recommend it to your friends for pointsChapter error? Click here to report